» Articles » PMID: 8409848

Connecting Goals and Actions During Reading

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 1993 Sep 1
PMID 8409848
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three experiments showed that reading about a character's actions can reactivate a goal of the character stated earlier in the passage and backgrounded by intervening material. Subjects were slower to read a line describing an action that was inconsistent with a goal of the protagonist than they were to read about an action that was consistent with the goal, even though both lines were locally coherent. Goals were reactivated even when the intervening material did not describe attempts to achieve the goal (Experiment 2) and when the intervening material described another goal of the protagonist (Experiment 3). The results suggest that reading a sentence can reactivate relevant information from earlier in the text, even when the sentence is coherent with its immediate context and the reactivated information has been backgrounded by several lines of unrelated text.

Citing Articles

Surviving with story characters: What do we remember?.

Cook A, Klin C, Westerman D Mem Cognit. 2023; 51(6):1303-1316.

PMID: 36633820 PMC: 9838267. DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01391-2.


Text validation: Overlooking consistency effect discrepancies.

Singer M, Spear J, Rodrigo-Tamarit M Mem Cognit. 2022; 51(2):437-454.

PMID: 35984623 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01351-w.


Coherence formation during narrative text processing: a comparison between auditory and audiovisual text presentation in 9- to 12-year-old children.

Wannagat W, Waizenegger G, Nieding G Cogn Process. 2021; 22(2):299-310.

PMID: 33404902 PMC: 8179903. DOI: 10.1007/s10339-020-01008-z.


Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change.

Haigh M, Wood J, Stewart A Mem Cognit. 2016; 44(5):819-36.

PMID: 26886759 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0596-9.


Suppression of Story Character Goals During Reading.

Linderholm T, Gernsbacher M, van den Broek P, Neninde L, Robertson R, Sundermier B Discourse Process. 2014; 37(1):67-78.

PMID: 25520532 PMC: 4266429. DOI: 10.1207/s15326950dp3701_4.