The Electrified Catheter. Role in Sterilizing Urine and Decreasing Bacteriuria
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
A catheter was designed to decrease the incidence of catheter-induced urinary infections. A randomized, controlled study was performed to assess its safety and efficacy. The study comprised 24 patients subjected to hemorrhoidectomy. The criteria for entry were a preoperative urinary pathogen count below 10(5) colony-forming units/ml urine as well as postoperative urinary retention that did not respond to conservative measures. The 24 patients were randomly assigned to treatment using a Nelaton catheter in 12 patients and an electrified catheter in the remaining 12. The catheters were left in place for 3 days, during which cephalosporin was given parenterally. The electrified catheter (EC) carried two silver-silver chloride electrodes. During the 3 days of catheterization and for 4 days thereafter, daily urine samples were cultured. The criterion for catheter-induced urinary infection was a pathogen count above 10(5) colony-forming units/ml urine. No complication was encountered from catheterization. Electrodes were not broken. A bacterial count above 10(5) colony-forming units was found in 7 of 12 patients in the Nelaton catheter group, and a count below 10(5) units was determined in the 12 patients in the EC group. The study demonstrated that the EC can decrease the incidence of catheter-induced urinary infections. The EC is safe, cost-effective, and without complications.
Antibiofilm Activity of Electrical Current in a Catheter Model.
Voegele P, Badiola J, Schmidt-Malan S, Karau M, Greenwood-Quaintance K, Mandrekar J Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015; 60(3):1476-80.
PMID: 26711752 PMC: 4775985. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01628-15.
Types of indwelling urethral catheters for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults.
Lam T, Omar M, Fisher E, Gillies K, MacLennan S Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (9):CD004013.
PMID: 25248140 PMC: 11197149. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004013.pub4.
Electrical microcurrent to prevent conditioning film and bacterial adhesion to urological stents.
Gabi M, Hefermehl L, Lukic D, Zahn R, Voros J, Eberli D Urol Res. 2010; 39(2):81-8.
PMID: 20686759 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-010-0284-3.
Is it possible to prevent bacterial adhesion onto ureteric stents?.
Cormio L, La Forgia P, La Forgia D, Siitonen A, Ruutu M Urol Res. 1997; 25(3):213-6.
PMID: 9228675 DOI: 10.1007/BF00941985.