» Articles » PMID: 8367768

Mechanics of Interbody Spinal Fusion. Analysis of Critical Bone Graft Area

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1993 Jun 15
PMID 8367768
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone graft subsidence is a serious complication of interbody spinal fusion. In this study, 66 mechanical tests were performed on 35 thoracic vertebral bodies to investigate the in situ mechanics of interbody spinal fusion. The relationships among trabecular bone density, bone strength, and size of bone graft area were analyzed. All vertebral bodies were scanned by quantitative computer tomography (QCT) to determine their bone density before mechanical testing. The decorticated trabecular beds of the vertebral bodies, void of all posterior elements, were loaded in a manner similar to that which occurs after surgical interbody fusion. That is, rectangular blocks of polymethylmethacrylate, representing bone grafts, were used to transfer controlled compressive loads to the decorticated vertebral trabecular surface. Both destructive and nondestructive tests were performed. The relationship between QCT bone density and trabecular bone strength was related by a power function, and, on average, the bone density and trabecular bone strength were 0.137 g/cm3 and 3.97 MPa, respectively. Eighty percent of the vertebral bodies with graft covering 25% of the total end plate area or less failed at loads less than 600 N, while 88% of the vertebral bodies with 30% or greater covered were able to carry a load greater than 600 N. The results suggest that the intrinsic behavior of trabecular bone loaded within the vertebral body is little different from the behavior of the whole body, that QCT bone density is indicative of bone strength, and that interbody graft area should be significantly greater than 30% of the total end plate area to provide a margin of safety.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Outcomes for standalone anterolateral corpectomy for thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Ortiz Torres M, Ravipati K, Smith C, Norby K, Pleitez J, Galicich W Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):816.

PMID: 39443336 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-03049-w.


Fusion's Location and Quality within the Fixated Segment Following Transforaminal Interbody Fusion (TLIF).

Essa A, Shehade M, Rabau O, Smorgick Y, Mirovsky Y, Anekstein Y Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(21).

PMID: 37957959 PMC: 10648832. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11212814.


Postoperative cage migration and subsidence following TLIF surgery is not associated with bony fusion.

Rickert M, Fennema P, Wehner D, Rahim T, Holper B, Eichler M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12597.

PMID: 37537231 PMC: 10400549. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-38801-7.


Is local autogenous morselized bone harvested from decompression through a posterior-transforaminal approach sufficient for single-level interbody fusion in the lower lumbar spine?.

Yang J, Yang Y, Wang G, Xu S, Li G, Zhang S BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1):12.

PMID: 36609247 PMC: 9817406. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06131-4.


Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes between the n-HA/PA66 Cage and the PEEK Cage Used in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Matched-Pair Case Control Study.

Zhang Z, Hu B, Wang L, Yang H, Li T, Liu L Orthop Surg. 2022; 15(1):152-161.

PMID: 36398388 PMC: 9837244. DOI: 10.1111/os.13593.