» Articles » PMID: 8366477

The Processing of Homophonic Homographs During Reading: Evidence from Eye Movement Studies

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Psychology
Date 1993 Mar 1
PMID 8366477
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research on the processing of homophonic homographs during reading is reviewed. The primary dependent variable considered was fixation time on target homographs. Both the characteristics of the homograph (whether there are two equally likely meanings or one dominant meaning) and the characteristics of the preceding context (whether it is neutral or contains disambiguating information) were varied. When the preceding context was neutral, readers fixated longer on balanced homographs (homographs having two equally likely meanings) than on control words matched on frequency and length, but didn't look any longer at biased homographs (homographs having a highly dominant meaning) than matched control words. However, when the preceding context disambiguated toward the subordinate meaning, readers fixated longer on a biased homograph than a matched control word (the subordinate bias effect). Attempts to eliminate the subordinate bias effect are described and the implications of our research for models of lexical ambiguity resolution are discussed.

Citing Articles

The Processing of Lexical Ambiguity: Evidence from Child and Adult Greek.

Kaltsa M, Papadopoulou D J Psycholinguist Res. 2024; 53(1):16.

PMID: 38383830 PMC: 10881745. DOI: 10.1007/s10936-024-10063-y.


Studying Individual Differences in Language Comprehension: The Challenges of Item-Level Variability and Well-Matched Control Conditions.

Blott L, Gowenlock A, Kievit R, Nation K, Rodd J J Cogn. 2023; 6(1):54.

PMID: 37692192 PMC: 10487189. DOI: 10.5334/joc.317.


Learning about the meanings of ambiguous words: evidence from a word-meaning priming paradigm with short narratives.

Blott L, Hartopp O, Nation K, Rodd J PeerJ. 2022; 10:e14070.

PMID: 36281360 PMC: 9587715. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14070.


Offline dominance and zeugmatic similarity normings of variably ambiguous words assessed against a neural language model (BERT).

DeLong K, Trott S, Kutas M Behav Res Methods. 2022; 55(4):1537-1557.

PMID: 35689168 PMC: 10040203. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01869-6.


Does diacritics-based lexical disambiguation modulate word frequency, length, and predictability effects? An eye-movements investigation of processing Arabic diacritics.

Hermena E, Bouamama S, Liversedge S, Drieghe D PLoS One. 2021; 16(11):e0259987.

PMID: 34780557 PMC: 8592420. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259987.


References
1.
Rayner K, Duffy S . Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Mem Cognit. 1986; 14(3):191-201. DOI: 10.3758/bf03197692. View

2.
Paul S, Kellas G, Martin M, Clark M . Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992; 18(4):703-17. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.18.4.703. View

3.
Rayner K, Frazier L . Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989; 15(5):779-90. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.15.5.779. View

4.
Inhoff A, Rayner K . Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency. Percept Psychophys. 1986; 40(6):431-9. DOI: 10.3758/bf03208203. View

5.
Morrison R, Rayner K . Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle. Percept Psychophys. 1981; 30(4):395-6. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206156. View