» Articles » PMID: 8357703

Models of Source Currents in the Brain

Overview
Journal Brain Topogr
Specialty Neurology
Date 1993 Jan 1
PMID 8357703
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) provide signals that are weighted integrals of source currents in the brain. In addition to technical aspects, the two methods differ in their sensitivities to various cerebral sources. Moreover, it is more difficult to determine the lead fields of EEG than of MEG. If it can be assumed that only one localized source is active at a particular time, the source location, direction, and amplitude can be found with the dipole model. However, if the assumption of a single localized source is violated, erroneous results are obtained. If a few sources are responsible for the measured fields, multiple-dipole models can be used. In the general case one must start from the fundamentals of estimation theory. The use of a priori information, together with experimental data, will provide the best possible solution to the inverse problem. In the case of minimal prior information, the so-called minimum-norm solution is obtained. With the help of supplementary information, the resolution can be further improved.

Citing Articles

Accuracy and spatial properties of distributed magnetic source imaging techniques in the investigation of focal epilepsy patients.

Pellegrino G, Hedrich T, Porras-Bettancourt M, Lina J, Aydin U, Hall J Hum Brain Mapp. 2020; 41(11):3019-3033.

PMID: 32386115 PMC: 7336148. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24994.


Empirical Comparison of Distributed Source Localization Methods for Single-Trial Detection of Movement Preparation.

Seeland A, Krell M, Straube S, Kirchner E Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12:340.

PMID: 30233341 PMC: 6129768. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00340.


Near-instant automatic access to visually presented words in the human neocortex: neuromagnetic evidence.

Shtyrov Y, MacGregor L Sci Rep. 2016; 6:26558.

PMID: 27217080 PMC: 4877599. DOI: 10.1038/srep26558.


Automatic ultrarapid activation and inhibition of cortical motor systems in spoken word comprehension.

Shtyrov Y, Butorina A, Nikolaeva A, Stroganova T Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(18):E1918-23.

PMID: 24753617 PMC: 4020094. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1323158111.


Neural dynamics of speech act comprehension: an MEG study of naming and requesting.

Egorova N, Pulvermuller F, Shtyrov Y Brain Topogr. 2013; 27(3):375-92.

PMID: 24253730 PMC: 3976511. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-013-0329-3.


References
1.
Williamson S, Lu Z, Karron D, Kaufman L . Advantages and limitations of magnetic source imaging. Brain Topogr. 1991; 4(2):169-80. DOI: 10.1007/BF01132773. View

2.
Ahlfors S, Ilmoniemi R, Hamalainen M . Estimates of visually evoked cortical currents. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992; 82(3):225-36. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90172-e. View

3.
Romani G, Williamson S, Kaufman L . Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science. 1982; 216(4552):1339-40. DOI: 10.1126/science.7079770. View

4.
de Munck J . The estimation of time varying dipoles on the basis of evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990; 77(2):156-60. DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(90)90032-9. View

5.
Wang J, Williamson S, Kaufman L . Magnetic source images determined by a lead-field analysis: the unique minimum-norm least-squares estimation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1992; 39(7):665-75. DOI: 10.1109/10.142641. View