» Articles » PMID: 8356985

Etiology of Large Pericardial Effusions

Overview
Journal Am J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1993 Aug 1
PMID 8356985
Citations 69
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effectiveness of the preoperative evaluation and overall diagnostic efficacy of subxiphoid pericardial biopsy with fluid drainage in patients with new, large pericardial effusions.

Design: A prospective interventional case series of consecutive patients admitted with new, large pericardial effusions.

Patients And Methods: Fifty-seven of 75 consecutive patients admitted to a university tertiary-care center and a university-affiliated Veterans Administration Medical Center with new, large pericardial effusions were studied over a 20-month period. Each patient was assessed by a comprehensive preoperative evaluation followed by subxiphoid pericardiotomy. The patients' tissue and fluid samples were studied pathologically and cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, fungi, mycobacteria, mycoplasmas, and viruses.

Results: A diagnosis was made in 53 (93%) patients. The principle diagnoses consisted of malignancy in 13 (23%) patients; viral infection in 8 (14%) patients; radiation-induced inflammation in 8 (14%) patients; collagen-vascular disease in 7 (12%) patients; and uremia in 7 (12%) patients. No diagnosis was made in four (7%) patients. A variety of unexpected organisms were cultured from either pericardial fluid or tissue: cytomegalovirus (three), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (two), herpes simplex virus (one), Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare (one), and Mycobacterium chelonei (one). The pericardial fluid yielded a diagnosis in 15 (26%) patients, 11 of whom had malignant effusions. The examination of pericardial tissue was useful in the diagnosis of 13 (23%) patients, 8 of whom had an infectious agent cultured. Of the 57 patients undergoing surgery, the combined diagnostic yield from both fluid and tissue was 19 patients (33%).

Conclusions: A systematic preoperative evaluation in conjunction with fluid and tissue analysis following subxiphoid pericardiotomy yields a diagnosis in the majority of patients with large pericardial effusions. This approach may also result in the culturing of "unusual" infectious organisms from pericardial tissue and fluid.

Citing Articles

Heart-breaking tumours: a case series of malignant pericardial effusion.

Wan Muhamad Hatta S, Mirza A, Sunni N, Bashir A Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2025; 9(3):ytaf009.

PMID: 40046975 PMC: 11879449. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf009.


Incidence of secondary pericardial effusions associated with different etiologies: a comprehensive review of literature.

Ebrahimi P, Taheri H, Bahiraie P, Rader F, Siegel R, Mandegar M J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025; 20(1):141.

PMID: 39987086 PMC: 11846477. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-025-03370-5.


The Wide Spectrum of Presentations of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Immunocompetent Hosts: An Exhaustive Narrative Review.

Schattner A Pathogens. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 39204267 PMC: 11357360. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13080667.


Screening Tests Predicting Cancer Metastasis in the Etiology of Pericardial Effusion: HALP Score and PNI.

Koyun E, Dindas F, Sahin A, Cerik I, Dogdus M Arq Bras Cardiol. 2024; 121(1):e20230376.

PMID: 38451561 PMC: 11081201. DOI: 10.36660/abc.20230376.


Incidence of malignant pericardial effusion in pericardiocentesis patients and post-procedure care: an oncology center pilot study.

Jamil G, Jamil S, Saleem A, AlKindi F, Aziz F, Al Zaabi A Am J Transl Res. 2023; 15(5):3355-3364.

PMID: 37303650 PMC: 10251007.