Lam A, Wixted J
Mem Cognit. 2024; .
PMID: 39509017
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01649-x.
Albright T
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(38):e2206567119.
PMID: 36099301
PMC: 9499562.
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2206567119.
Aujla H
Behav Res Methods. 2022; 55(5):2532-2558.
PMID: 36050574
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01913-5.
Yim H, Osth A, Sloutsky V, Dennis S
Psychol Sci. 2022; 33(7):1154-1171.
PMID: 35723971
PMC: 9343861.
DOI: 10.1177/09567976211073131.
Fysh M, Bindemann M
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022; 76(4):862-880.
PMID: 35587796
PMC: 10031636.
DOI: 10.1177/17470218221104476.
More evidence against the Spinozan model: Cognitive load diminishes memory for "true" feedback.
Nadarevic L, Erdfelder E
Mem Cognit. 2019; 47(7):1386-1400.
PMID: 31215012
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00940-6.
A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.
Koop G, Criss A, Pardini A
Mem Cognit. 2019; 47(4):842-854.
PMID: 30790209
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00906-8.
One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.
Hilford A, Glanzer M, Kim K, Maloney L
Mem Cognit. 2018; 47(2):266-278.
PMID: 30288686
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0864-y.
Mechanisms of word concreteness effects in explicit memory: Does context availability play a role?.
Taylor R, Francis W, Borunda-Vazquez L, Carbajal J
Mem Cognit. 2018; 47(1):169-181.
PMID: 30182327
PMC: 6353691.
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-018-0857-x.
Three regularities of recognition memory: the role of bias.
Hilford A, Maloney L, Glanzer M, Kim K
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015; 22(6):1646-64.
PMID: 25933627
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0829-0.
Lateral posterior parietal activity during reality monitoring discriminations of memories of high and low perceptual vividness.
King D, Schubert M, Miller M
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2015; 15(3):662-79.
PMID: 25925490
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-015-0357-4.
A density explanation of valence asymmetries in recognition memory.
Alves H, Unkelbach C, Burghardt J, Koch A, Kruger T, Becker V
Mem Cognit. 2015; 43(6):896-909.
PMID: 25772462
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0515-5.
Associative recognition and the list strength paradigm.
Osth A, Dennis S
Mem Cognit. 2013; 42(4):583-94.
PMID: 24317960
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0386-6.
Parametric effects of word frequency in memory for mixed frequency lists.
Lohnas L, Kahana M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013; 39(6):1943-6.
PMID: 23834055
PMC: 4093832.
DOI: 10.1037/a0033669.
Likelihood-free Bayesian analysis of memory models.
Turner B, Dennis S, Van Zandt T
Psychol Rev. 2013; 120(3):667-678.
PMID: 23586446
PMC: 4140406.
DOI: 10.1037/a0032458.
Why it's easier to remember seeing a face we already know than one we don't: preexisting memory representations facilitate memory formation.
Reder L, Victoria L, Manelis A, Oates J, Dutcher J, Bates J
Psychol Sci. 2013; 24(3):363-72.
PMID: 23395827
PMC: 4180115.
DOI: 10.1177/0956797612457396.
Memory in motion: movement dynamics reveal memory strength.
Papesh M, Goldinger S
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012; 19(5):906-13.
PMID: 22711579
PMC: 3458147.
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0281-3.
Negative effects of item repetition on source memory.
Kim K, Yi D, Raye C, Johnson M
Mem Cognit. 2012; 40(6):889-901.
PMID: 22411165
PMC: 4922421.
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0196-2.
Remembering words in context as predicted by an associative read-out model.
Hofmann M, Kuchinke L, Biemann C, Tamm S, Jacobs A
Front Psychol. 2011; 2:252.
PMID: 22007183
PMC: 3185299.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00252.
A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.
Shiffrin R, Steyvers M
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011; 4(2):145-66.
PMID: 21331823
DOI: 10.3758/BF03209391.