» Articles » PMID: 8347500

A Phase I Study of Intravenous Bryostatin 1 in Patients with Advanced Cancer

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 1993 Aug 1
PMID 8347500
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bryostatin 1 is a novel antitumour agent derived from Bugula neritina of the marine phylum Ectoprocta. Nineteen patients with advanced solid tumours were entered into a phase I study to evaluate the toxicity and biological effects of bryostatin 1. Bryostatin 1 was given as a one hour intravenous infusion at the beginning of each 2 week treatment cycle. A maximum of three treatment cycles were given. Doses were escalated in steps from 5 to 65 micrograms m-2 in successive patient groups. The maximum tolerated dose was 50 micrograms m-2. Myalgia was the dose limiting toxicity and was of WHO grade 3 in all three patients treated at 65 micrograms m-2. Flu-like symptoms were common but were of maximum WHO grade 2. Hypotension, of maximum WHO grade 1, occurred in six patients treated at doses up to and including 20 micrograms m-2 and may not have been attributable to treatment with bryostatin 1. Cellulitis and thrombophlebitis occurred at the bryostatin 1 infusion site of patients treated at all dose levels up to 50 micrograms m-2, attributable to the 60% ethanol diluent in the bryostatin 1 infusion. Subsequent patients treated at 50 and 65 micrograms m-2 received treatment with an intravenous normal saline flush and they did not develop these complications. Significant decreases of the platelet count and total leucocyte, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were seen in the first 24 h after treatment at the dose of 65 micrograms m-2. Immediate decreases in haemoglobin of up to 1.9g dl-1 were also noted in patients treated with 65 micrograms m-2, in the absence of clinical evidence of bleeding or haemodynamic compromise. No effect was observed on the incidence of haemopoietic progenitor cells in the marrow. Some patients' neutrophils demonstrated enhanced superoxide radical formation in response to in vitro stimulation with opsonised zymosan (a bacterial polysaccharide) but in the absence of this additional stimulus, no bryostatin 1 effect was observed. Lymphocyte natural killing activity was decreased 2 h after treatment with bryostatin 1, but the effect was not consistently seen 24 h or 7 days later. With the dose schedule examined no antitumour effects were observed. We recommend that bryostatin 1 is used at a dose of 35 to 50 micrograms m-2 two weekly in phase II studies in patients with malignancies including lymphoma, leukaemia, melanoma or hypernephroma, for which pre-clinical investigations suggest antitumour activity.

Citing Articles

Harnessing bacterial metabolites for enhanced cancer chemotherapy: unveiling unique therapeutic potentials.

Chatterjee A, Khan R, Mukherjee T, Sahoo P, Tiwari L, Singh B Arch Microbiol. 2024; 206(11):449.

PMID: 39472338 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-024-04179-x.


Destroying the Shield of Cancer Stem Cells: Natural Compounds as Promising Players in Cancer Therapy.

Lo Iacono M, Gaggianesi M, Bianca P, Brancato O, Muratore G, Modica C J Clin Med. 2022; 11(23).

PMID: 36498571 PMC: 9737492. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236996.


Marine Anticancer Agents: An Overview with a Particular Focus on Their Chemical Classes.

Barreca M, Spano V, Montalbano A, Cueto M, Diaz Marrero A, Deniz I Mar Drugs. 2020; 18(12).

PMID: 33291602 PMC: 7761941. DOI: 10.3390/md18120619.


Cancer Biomarkers for Integrative Oncology.

Ganguly A, Frank D, Kumar N, Cheng Y, Chu E Curr Oncol Rep. 2019; 21(4):32.

PMID: 30834992 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0782-6.


Bryostatin-1 causes radiosensitization of BMG-1 malignant glioma cells through differential activation of protein kinase-Cδ not evident in the non-malignant AA8 fibroblasts.

Dagur R, Hambarde S, Chandna S Mol Cell Biochem. 2014; 401(1-2):49-59.

PMID: 25472878 DOI: 10.1007/s11010-014-2291-0.


References
1.
Castagna M, Takai Y, Kaibuchi K, Sano K, Kikkawa U, NISHIZUKA Y . Direct activation of calcium-activated, phospholipid-dependent protein kinase by tumor-promoting phorbol esters. J Biol Chem. 1982; 257(13):7847-51. View

2.
Hornung R, PEARSON J, Beckwith M, Longo D . Preclinical evaluation of bryostatin as an anticancer agent against several murine tumor cell lines: in vitro versus in vivo activity. Cancer Res. 1992; 52(1):101-7. View

3.
Kiss Z, Deli E, Shoji M, Koeffler H, Pettit G, VOGLER W . Differential effects of various protein kinase C activators on protein phosphorylation in human acute myeloblastic leukemia cell line KG-1 and its phorbol ester-resistant subline KG-1a. Cancer Res. 1987; 47(5):1302-7. View

4.
Tallant E, Smith J, Wallace R . Bryostatins mimic the effects of phorbol esters in intact human platelets. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1987; 929(1):40-6. DOI: 10.1016/0167-4889(87)90239-4. View

5.
Kiss Z, Deli E, GIRARD P, Pettit G, Kuo J . Comparative effects of polymyxin B, phorbol ester and bryostatin on protein phosphorylation, protein kinase C translocation, phospholipid metabolism and differentiation of HL60 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1987; 146(1):208-15. DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(87)90712-1. View