» Articles » PMID: 8322000

The Effects of Background Noise and Working Memory Capacity on Speechreading Performance

Overview
Journal Scand Audiol
Date 1993 Jan 1
PMID 8322000
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of background noise and working memory capacity on speechreading performance. The results displayed no differences in speechreading performance (i.e. on a word-test and on a sentence-test) due to background noise. When working memory capacity was correlated with speechreading, only one of the two tests of working memory capacity (i.e. the reading span task) was found to be related to speechreading performance. This relationship applies to both speechreading tests, but only to one specific background noise condition in the tests: meaningful noise. The results are discussed with respect to the demands of simultaneous storage and processing in working memory and how these demands apply to speech-based noise distractors. It was also concluded that although performance was similar across different background noise conditions, they apparently engage different components of the individual's cognitive system.

Citing Articles

Recognition of Sentences With Complex Syntax in Speech Babble by Adolescents With Normal Hearing or Cochlear Implants.

Nittrouer S, Lowenstein J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023; 66(3):1110-1135.

PMID: 36758200 PMC: 10205108. DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00407.


Speechreading Ability Is Related to Phonological Awareness and Single-Word Reading in Both Deaf and Hearing Children.

Buchanan-Worster E, MacSweeney M, Pimperton H, Kyle F, Harris M, Beedie I J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(11):3775-3785.

PMID: 33108258 PMC: 8530507. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00159.


Working Memory Training and Speech in Noise Comprehension in Older Adults.

Wayne R, Hamilton C, Huyck J, Johnsrude I Front Aging Neurosci. 2016; 8:49.

PMID: 27047370 PMC: 4801856. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00049.


Comparison of informational vs. energetic masking effects on speechreading performance.

Lidestam B, Holgersson J, Moradi S Front Psychol. 2014; 5:639.

PMID: 25009520 PMC: 4068195. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00639.


Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis.

Daneman M, Merikle P Psychon Bull Rev. 2013; 3(4):422-33.

PMID: 24213976 DOI: 10.3758/BF03214546.