» Articles » PMID: 8313921

Effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure and Mean Airway Pressure on Respiratory Compliance and Gas Exchange in Children with Liver Disease

Overview
Journal Eur J Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 8313921
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and mean airway pressure (MAP) on respiratory compliance and gas exchange was assessed in children with liver disease. In the first study of 12 patients, PEEP was decreased either by 3 cmH2O below the baseline level (the child's original level) or to 0 cmH2O and then increased to 3 cmH2O above the baseline. Decreasing PEEP impaired compliance (P < 0.01), and oxygenation (P < 0.05), whereas increasing PEEP improved compliance (P < 0.05) and oxygenation (P < 0.05). Neither increasing nor decreasing PEEP caused significant changes in the carbon dioxide levels. In the second study, 24 children were studied at their baseline settings and then after increasing the PEEP by 3 cm H2O while simultaneously lowering the peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) to maintain MAP constant (12 children had lung function measurements). In the group overall increasing PEEP while decreasing PIP resulted in an insignificant change in paO2, but a significant increase paCO2 (P < 0.01) and reduction in tidal volume (P < 0.01), the change in compliance was not significant. After a second period at the baseline settings, in 12 children inspiratory time (TI) was increased while keeping MAP constant by reducing PIP. No significant change in paO2 or compliance was experienced, but paCO2 increased (P < 0.05) and tidal volume decreased (P < 0.01). In the other 12 children MAP was increased by prolonging TI. Increasing MAP had a variable effect and the changes in paO2 and paCO2 were not significant. No critical MAP level with regard to oxygenation was demonstrated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Recognizing Risks and Optimizing Perioperative Care to Reduce Respiratory Complications in the Pediatric Patient.

Egbuta C, Mason K J Clin Med. 2020; 9(6).

PMID: 32580323 PMC: 7355459. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061942.


Recommendations for mechanical ventilation of critically ill children from the Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC).

Kneyber M, De Luca D, Calderini E, Jarreau P, Javouhey E, Lopez-Herce J Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43(12):1764-1780.

PMID: 28936698 PMC: 5717127. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4920-z.

References
1.
Sivan Y, Deakers T, Newth C . Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory compliance in children with acute respiratory failure. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1991; 11(2):103-7. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1950110205. View

2.
Greenough A . The premature infant's respiratory response to mechanical ventilation. Early Hum Dev. 1988; 17(1):1-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(88)80051-3. View

3.
Field D, Milner A, Hopkin I . Effects of positive end expiratory pressure during ventilation of the preterm infant. Arch Dis Child. 1985; 60(9):843-7. PMC: 1777463. DOI: 10.1136/adc.60.9.843. View

4.
Hird M, Greenough A, Mieli-Vergani G, Mowat A . Hyperinflation in children with liver disease due to alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1991; 11(3):212-6. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1950110306. View

5.
Greenough A, Greenall F . Observation of spontaneous respiratory interaction with artificial ventilation. Arch Dis Child. 1988; 63(2):168-71. PMC: 1778704. DOI: 10.1136/adc.63.2.168. View