» Articles » PMID: 8312019

Is Personal Continuity of Care Compatible with Free Choice of Doctor? Patients' Views on Seeing the Same Doctor

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 1993 Dec 1
PMID 8312019
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While much has been written about the benefits of personal continuity of care there has been little research about the views of patients. In this cross sectional study 111 patients from three group practices (one of which ran a personal list system) were interviewed at home within a week of consulting a general practitioner. Patients were selected randomly from a systematic series of consulting sessions and a semi-structured interview was administered. Patients receiving more personal continuity of care were likely to be older, to have booked their most recent appointment further in advance, to desire personal continuity of care, to have an external health locus of control and to have a lower extroversion score. In the practice with a personal list, patients had a high level of continuity of care, were satisfied and showed little interest in having a choice of doctor. In the combined list practices patients valued their choice of doctor but often could not exercise it enough and they were more critical. They made more suggestions for change than those in the practice with a personal list system, mostly about receptionists and appointments. It is concluded that most patients like to see the same doctor, but they may not be willing to wait two days for this if there is a quicker option. It may be difficult to deliver both personal continuity of care and choice in group practice.

Citing Articles

Association of the length of doctor-patient relationship with primary care quality in seven family practices in Korea.

Lee J, Choi Y, Lee S, Sung N, Kim S, Hong J J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28(4):508-15.

PMID: 23580064 PMC: 3617301. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.4.508.


Continuity of Care: Literature review and implications.

Alazri M, Heywood P, Neal R, Leese B Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2011; 7(3):197-206.

PMID: 21748104 PMC: 3074883.


Physician assistants and nurse practitioners as a usual source of care.

Everett C, Schumacher J, Wright A, Smith M J Rural Health. 2009; 25(4):407-14.

PMID: 19780923 PMC: 2794129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00252.x.


The future for personal doctoring.

Haggerty J Br J Gen Pract. 2009; 59(561):236-7.

PMID: 19341550 PMC: 2662097. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X420275.


Practice features associated with patient-reported accessibility, continuity, and coordination of primary health care.

Haggerty J, Pineault R, Beaulieu M, Brunelle Y, Gauthier J, Goulet F Ann Fam Med. 2008; 6(2):116-23.

PMID: 18332403 PMC: 2267415. DOI: 10.1370/afm.802.


References
1.
Dietrich A, Marton K . Does continuous care from a physician make a difference?. J Fam Pract. 1982; 15(5):929-37. View

2.
Fox T . The personal doctor and his relation to the hospital. Observations and reflections on some American experiments in general practice by groups. Lancet. 1960; 1(7127):743-60. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(60)90632-2. View

3.
Hjortdahl P, Laerum E . Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ. 1992; 304(6837):1287-90. PMC: 1881840. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6837.1287. View

4.
Martin E, Russell D, Goodwin S, Chapman R, North M, Sheridan P . Why patients consult and what happens when they do. BMJ. 1991; 303(6797):289-92. PMC: 1670469. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.303.6797.289. View

5.
Freeman G, Richards S . How much personal care in four group practices?. BMJ. 1990; 301(6759):1028-30. PMC: 1664028. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.301.6759.1028. View