» Articles » PMID: 8308047

An EMG-assisted Model of Loads on the Lumbar Spine During Asymmetric Trunk Extensions

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 1993 Dec 1
PMID 8308047
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An EMG-assisted, low-back, lifting model is presented which simulates spinal loading as a function of dynamic, asymmetric, lifting exertions. The purpose of this study has been to develop a model which overcomes the limitations of previous models including static or isokinetic mechanics, inaccurate predictions of muscle coactivity, static interpretation of myoelectric activity, and physiologically unrealistic or variable muscle force per unit area. The present model predicts individual muscle forces from processed EMG data, normalized as a function of trunk angle and asymmetry, and modified to account for muscle length and velocity artifacts. The normalized EMGs are combined with muscle cross-sectional area and intrinsic strength capacity as determined on a per subject basis, to represent tensile force amplitudes. Dynamic internal and external force vectors are employed to predict trunk moments, spinal compression, lateral and anterior shear forces. Data from 20 subjects performing a total of 2160 exertions showed good agreement between predicted and measured values under all trunk angle, asymmetry, velocity, and acceleration conditions. The design represents a significant step toward accurate, fully dynamic modeling of the low-back in multiple dimensions. The benefits of such a model are the insights provided into the effects of motion induced, muscle co-activity on spinal loading in multiple dimensions.

Citing Articles

Dynamic assessment for low back-support exoskeletons during manual handling tasks.

Xiang X, Tanaka M, Umeno S, Kikuchi Y, Kobayashi Y Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1289686.

PMID: 38026894 PMC: 10667710. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1289686.


Reducing Back Exertion and Improving Confidence of Individuals with Low Back Pain with a Back Exosuit: A Feasibility Study for Use in BACPAC.

Quirk D, Chung J, Schiller G, Cherin J, Arens P, Sherman D Pain Med. 2023; 24(Suppl 1):S175-S186.

PMID: 36794907 PMC: 10403307. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnad003.


Trunk Muscle Coactivation in People with and without Low Back Pain during Fatiguing Frequency-Dependent Lifting Activities.

Varrecchia T, Conforto S, De Nunzio A, Draicchio F, Falla D, Ranavolo A Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(4).

PMID: 35214319 PMC: 8874369. DOI: 10.3390/s22041417.


Spine biomechanical testing methodologies: The controversy of consensus vs scientific evidence.

Costi J, Ledet E, OConnell G JOR Spine. 2021; 4(1):e1138.

PMID: 33778410 PMC: 7984003. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1138.


Surface Electromyography Meets Biomechanics: Correct Interpretation of sEMG-Signals in Neuro-Rehabilitation Needs Biomechanical Input.

Disselhorst-Klug C, Williams S Front Neurol. 2021; 11:603550.

PMID: 33424754 PMC: 7793912. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.603550.