» Articles » PMID: 8287634

Pharmacokinetics and Electrophysiological Effects of Intravenous Ajmaline

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1993 Nov 1
PMID 8287634
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of ajmaline were studied in 10 patients with suspected paroxysmal atrioventricular block who received a 1 mg/kg intravenous dose over 2 minutes for diagnostic purposes (ajmaline test). Plasma concentration decay followed a triexponential time course with a final half-life much longer (7.3 +/- 3.6 hours) than that previously found by other investigators (about 15 minutes). Mean total plasma clearance and renal clearance were 9.76 ml/min/kg and 0.028 ml/min/kg, respectively. Although most of the dose was eliminated through the extrarenal route (only 3.5% of the intravenous dose was recovered in urine), no fluorescent metabolites could be detected either in plasma or urine. The steady-state volume of distribution averaged 6.17 L/kg, and plasma protein binding ranged between 29 and 46%. Three patients developed a transient atrioventricular block after ajmaline administration. In the remainder, the drug prolonged atrio-His bundle (AH interval), His bundle-ventricular (HV interval) and intraventricular (QRS interval) conduction times. Corrected ventricular repolarisation time (QTc interval) showed less marked changes, which were biphasic at times. The mean maximum ajmaline-induced increase in HV interval was 98%, in QRS was 58%, in AH was 30%, and in QTc was 17%. In most cases the time course of electrocardiographic changes lagged behind that of plasma concentrations, suggesting a delayed equilibrium of plasma concentrations with the site of action (hysteresis). Despite that, the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model, which accounted for hysteresis, failed to fit the experimental data adequately.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

De novo biosynthesis of antiarrhythmic alkaloid ajmaline.

Guo J, Gao D, Lian J, Qu Y Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):457.

PMID: 38212296 PMC: 10784492. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-44797-z.


The Mechanism of Ajmaline and Thus Brugada Syndrome: Not Only the Sodium Channel!.

Monasky M, Micaglio E, DImperio S, Pappone C Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 8:782596.

PMID: 35004896 PMC: 8733296. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.782596.


Role of Provocable Brugada ECG Pattern in The Correct Risk Stratification for Major Arrhythmic Events.

Martini N, Testolina M, Toffanin G, Arancio R, De Mattia L, Cannas S J Clin Med. 2021; 10(5).

PMID: 33801474 PMC: 7958847. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10051025.


Ajmaline blocks I and I without eliciting differences between Brugada syndrome patient and control human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac clusters.

Miller D, Harmer S, Poliandri A, Nobles M, Edwards E, Ware J Stem Cell Res. 2017; 25:233-244.

PMID: 29172153 PMC: 5727153. DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2017.11.003.


Ajmaline Challenge To Unmask Infrahisian Disease In Patients With Recurrent And Unexplained Syncope, Preserved Ejection Fraction, With Or Without Conduction Abnormalities On Surface ECG.

Pentimalli F, Bacino L, Ghione M, Giambattista S, Gazzarata M, Bellotti P J Atr Fibrillation. 2016; 9(2):1421.

PMID: 27909532 PMC: 5129685. DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1421.


References
1.
Huang J . Errors in estimating the unbound fraction of drugs due to the volume shift in equilibrium dialysis. J Pharm Sci. 1983; 72(11):1368-9. DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600721137. View

2.
Weiss M . Modelling of initial distribution of drugs following intravenous bolus injection. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1983; 24(1):121-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00613938. View

3.
Knippel M, Cadel A, Mazzini C, Figini A, ROVELLI F . [Effects of ajmaline and of dimonchloracetylajmaline on atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction in man]. G Ital Cardiol. 1971; 1(4):321-30. View

4.
Arora R, MADAN B . Antiarrhythmics. VI. Ajmaline and serpentine in experimental cardiac arrhythmias. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1956; 117(1):62-7. View

5.
KLEINSORGE H, GAIDA P . [Behavior of the serum level after intravenous injections of ajmaline]. Klin Wochenschr. 1962; 40:149-51. DOI: 10.1007/BF01482017. View