» Articles » PMID: 8264138

Effect of an Increased Intraperitoneal Pressure on Fluid and Solute Transport During CAPD

Overview
Journal Kidney Int
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Nephrology
Date 1993 Nov 1
PMID 8264138
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The effect of an increased intraperitoneal pressure on fluid and solute transport was studied in eight stable CAPD patients. Two permeability tests of two hours each with continuous registration of the intraperitoneal pressure were performed while patients were in supine position. The intra-abdominal pressure was raised by means of a tightening girdle with inflatable cuffs in one of the experiments. Intraperitoneally administered dextran 70 was used as a volume marker in order to determine the peritoneal fluid kinetics. The increment in the intra-abdominal pressure of 10.0 +/- 1.0 mm Hg caused a decline in the net ultrafiltration. This was mainly determined by an increase in the lymphatic absorption: 1.07 +/- 0.18 ml/min (without compression) versus 1.86 +/- 0.25 ml/min (with compression; P < 0.01), whereas the transcapillary ultrafiltration rate tended to decrease: 2.02 +/- 0.23 versus 1.73 +/- 0.27 ml/min (P = 0.08). External compression also diminished solute transport from the circulation to the peritoneal cavity. The decline in the mass transfer area coefficient of urea, creatinine, urate and beta 2-microglobulin was 13%, indicating a smaller effective peritoneal surface area caused by external compression probably due to a decrease in the number of the perfused peritoneal capillaries. The fall in the peritoneal protein clearances was more pronounced the higher the molecular weight of the protein, consistent with a decline in the intrinsic permeability of the peritoneum. Kinetic modeling using computer simulations was used to analyse these effects in terms of the pore theory, using a convection model (large pore radius 184 +/- 14 A) and a diffusion model (large pore radius 1028 +/- 218 A) for the transport of macromolecules.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Pressure induces peritoneal fibrosis and inflammation through CD44 signaling.

Chen Y, Liao C, Wu M, Huang N, Cherng Y, Wu M Ren Fail. 2024; 46(2):2384586.

PMID: 39082695 PMC: 11293264. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2384586.


The gut microbiome tango in the progression of chronic kidney disease and potential therapeutic strategies.

Tang Z, Yu S, Pan Y J Transl Med. 2023; 21(1):689.

PMID: 37789439 PMC: 10546717. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04455-2.


Novel equations for estimating intraperitoneal pressure among peritoneal dialysis patients.

Li X, Ma T, Hao J, Song D, Wang H, Liu T Clin Kidney J. 2023; 16(9):1447-1456.

PMID: 37664572 PMC: 10469109. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad021.


Identification of the Factors Associated With Intraperitoneal Pressure in ADPKD Patients Treated With Peritoneal Dialysis.

Sigogne M, Kanagaratnam L, Mora C, Pierre M, Petrache A, Marcus C Kidney Int Rep. 2020; 5(7):1007-1013.

PMID: 32647758 PMC: 7335974. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.04.012.


In Search of a Simple and Reliable Method of Measuring Intra-abdominal Pressure in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients.

Thangarasa T, Foisy D, Leidecker J, Corsi D, Meggison H, Blew B Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2019; 6:2054358119892695.

PMID: 31839976 PMC: 6900622. DOI: 10.1177/2054358119892695.