» Articles » PMID: 8260369

A Simulated Sequential Analysis Based on Data from Two MRC Trials

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 1993 Dec 1
PMID 8260369
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The motivation for proposing sequential methods for cancer clinical trials is presented, and the methodology examined by re-analysing two completed phase III cancer trials of the Lung Cancer Working Party of the British Medical Research Council. The reanalysis proceeds as if the trials had been designed with a planned series of interim analyses governing stopping. Specifically, the triangular and double-triangular tests were applied. The sequential reanalysis gave a substantial reduction in the number of patient required, and deaths observed, for conclusions to be reached in comparison with the completed studies. In each case, the sequential analysis was stratified for baseline prognostic factors which were seen to be important at the first interim analysis.

Citing Articles

Development of negative feedback during successive growth cycles of black cherry.

Packer A, Clay K Proc Biol Sci. 2004; 271(1536):317-24.

PMID: 15058444 PMC: 1691590. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2583.


Stopping rules, interim analyses and data monitoring committees.

Ashby D, Machin D Br J Cancer. 1993; 68(6):1047-50.

PMID: 8260354 PMC: 1968643. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.481.

References
1.
Peto R, Pike M, Armitage P, Breslow N, Cox D, Howard S . Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design. Br J Cancer. 1976; 34(6):585-612. PMC: 2025229. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1976.220. View

2.
OBrien P, Fleming T . A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979; 35(3):549-56. View

3.
Whitehead J . Interim analyses and stopping rules in cancer clinical trials. Br J Cancer. 1993; 68(6):1179-85. PMC: 1968667. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.500. View

4.
Whitehead J . Overrunning and underrunning in sequential clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1992; 13(2):106-21. DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(92)90017-t. View

5.
Rosner G, Tsiatis A . The impact that group sequential tests would have made on ECOG clinical trials. Stat Med. 1989; 8(4):505-16. DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780080413. View