» Articles » PMID: 8260220

Working with Community Mental Health Professionals: a Survey Among General Practitioners

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 1993 Oct 1
PMID 8260220
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Links between general practitioners and mental health professionals, such as counsellors, psychiatrists, community psychiatric nurses, clinical psychologists and social workers, are increasing in number and type. The aim of this survey was to elicit general practitioners' attitudes to these workers, comparing those with a link with a mental health worker and those without. General practitioners in two district health authorities were surveyed and a response rate of 70% was obtained. General practitioners linked to a mental health professional were more likely to have made a referral to that service in the previous three months and, on the whole, were more satisfied with that service. The commonest problem reported by respondents was the length of waiting lists. Regarding liaison with social workers, inadequate feedback and difficulty with contact were the problems mentioned most by doctors. A number of general practitioners expressed a desire for closer contact with all these mental health services. While caution is required in ascribing causality to these relationships, it is clear that a closer working relationship between general practitioners and mental health workers is productive and is valued by general practitioners. The challenge for policy makers is to structure mental health provision in such a way that more general practitioners are able to benefit than at present.

Citing Articles

Deciding Factors for the Referral of a Female Patient to a Specific Hospital from the Viewpoint of Practice-Based Specialists.

Baum S, Meyberg-Solomayer G, Baum A, Radosa J, Hamza A, Gronwald B Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015; 75(5):456-461.

PMID: 26097249 PMC: 4461679. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1546035.


International comparison of clinicians' ability to identify depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression of predictors.

Mitchell A, Rao S, Vaze A Br J Gen Pract. 2011; 61(583):e72-80.

PMID: 21276327 PMC: 3026173. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X556227.


General practitioners' evaluation of community psychiatric services: responsiveness to change of the General Practitioner Experiences Questionnaire (GPEQ).

Bjertnaes O, Nieland A, Damerell E, Garratt A BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10:108.

PMID: 20433719 PMC: 2874551. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-108.


Mental disorders and mental health care in Canada and Australia: comparative epidemiological findings.

Tempier R, Meadows G, Vasiliadis H, Mosier K, Lesage A, Stiller A Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2008; 44(1):63-72.

PMID: 18626555 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-008-0409-y.


[Who comes from where and who goes where? Treatment methods for psychiatric inpatients].

Hubner-Liebermann B, Spiessl H, Cording C Nervenarzt. 2004; 76(7):856, 858-62, 864.

PMID: 15448919 DOI: 10.1007/s00115-004-1815-3.


References
1.
Strathdee G, Williams P . A survey of psychiatrists in primary care: the silent growth of a new service. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984; 34(268):615-8. PMC: 1960060. View

2.
Strathdee G . Psychiatrists in primary care: the general practitioner viewpoint. Fam Pract. 1988; 5(2):111-5. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/5.2.111. View

3.
Pullen I, Yellowlees A . Scottish psychiatrists in primary health-care settings. A silent majority. Br J Psychiatry. 1988; 153:663-6. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.153.5.663. View

4.
Bennett C . The Worcester development project: general practitioner satisfaction with a new community psychiatric service. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989; 39(320):106-9. PMC: 1711786. View

5.
Briscoe M, Wilkinson G . General practitioners' use of community psychiatric nursing services: a preliminary survey. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989; 39(327):412-4. PMC: 1712101. View