Measurement Strategies in Social Support: a Descriptive Review of the Literature
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Social support literature has been criticized for lacking methodological clarity. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic descriptive review of the social support literature, outline measurement problems, identify the nature of assessment inadequacies, and provide recommendations for the future. Two-hundred sixty-two empirically based articles published between 1980 and 1987 were reviewed comprehensively. Information about social support measurement and sample characteristics was obtained. A system was designed to organize the data on sample characteristics, type of instrument, source of support assessed, and category of support measured. The social support literature also was described from a methodological perspective, and several trends were identified. Conclusions about conceptual maturity, a priori biases, measurement of network utilization, and social support sources are discussed.
Lin S, Yuan Z, Niu G, Fan C, Hao X Int J Ment Health Addict. 2023; :1-19.
PMID: 36811077 PMC: 9933806. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-023-01026-w.
Community Participation Among Individuals with Severe Mental Disorders During COVID-19 Pandemic.
Li Y, Zhuo Y, Liu Y Community Ment Health J. 2022; 59(3):486-497.
PMID: 36269512 PMC: 9589758. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-01032-7.
Perceived Social Support and Stress: a Study of 1st Year Students in Ireland.
McLean L, Gaul D, Penco R Int J Ment Health Addict. 2022; :1-21.
PMID: 35103049 PMC: 8791695. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-021-00710-z.
The Influence of Culture, Social, and Religious Support on Well-Being in Breast Cancer Survivorship.
Flores N, Mathew M, Fortson L, Abernethy A, Ashing K Cureus. 2021; 13(3):e14158.
PMID: 33936871 PMC: 8078221. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14158.
Huang J, Jiang Z, Zhang T, Wang L, Chu Y, Shen M Inquiry. 2019; 56:46958019883175.
PMID: 31631723 PMC: 6804357. DOI: 10.1177/0046958019883175.