» Articles » PMID: 8213875

Groshong Catheter-associated Subclavian Venous Thrombosis

Overview
Journal Am J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1993 Oct 1
PMID 8213875
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To identify factors associated with the development of clinically significant venous thrombosis in cancer patients with long-term indwelling subclavian Groshong catheters (GC). Also, to assess both the subsequent performance of affected catheters and the effect of heparin and warfarin therapy on subsequent catheter function and longevity.

Methods: Longitudinal study of the outcome of clinical practice. Subset analysis of those catheters developing catheter-related venous thrombosis (CRVT).

Results: Thirty-seven cases of CRVT were identified in a population of 255 consecutive patients in whom a GC was inserted. Seventy percent of the thrombi occurred after an episode of previous catheter dysfunction; only 30% of the thrombi occurred de novo. An unexpectedly high risk of thrombosis was associated with insertion into the left-subclavian circulation (25 of 35 versus 135 of 220, p = 0.02) or with an antecedent episode of aspiration difficulty ("ball-valve effect" [BVE]) (20 of 35 versus 60 of 220, p < 0.01). No correlation was identified between thrombosis and tumor type, tumor histology, or preexisting medical disorders. Once identified, 79% of the involved patients received anticoagulant therapy with sequential heparin and warfarin. Overall longevity of the catheters preserved by anticoagulation (mean dwell = 202 days) far exceeded catheter longevity among the population of catheters that never developed thrombosis (mean dwell = 142 days). The mean catheter longevity after thrombosis (169 days) also exceeded the mean dwell time of all other catheters that were complication-free.

Conclusions: CRVT is more likely in patients in whom the catheter is inserted in the left-subclavian circulation or who have experienced a previous episode of aspiration difficulty with the catheter (BVE). Catheter preservation with sequential heparin and warfarin therapy precludes the need for catheter removal and extends dramatically the useful life of the catheter.

Citing Articles

Comparison of heparinized saline and 0.9% sodium chloride for maintaining central venous catheter patency in healthy dogs.

Vose J, Odunayo A, Price J, Daves M, Schildt J, Tolbert M PeerJ. 2019; 7:e7072.

PMID: 31183263 PMC: 6546076. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7072.


Right or left? Side selection for a totally implantable vascular access device: a randomised observational study.

Lin W, Lin C, Hsu C, Lee Y, Lin Y, Hsu M Br J Cancer. 2017; 117(7):932-937.

PMID: 28787431 PMC: 5625671. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.264.


Clinical review and analysis of complications of totally implantable venous access devices for chemotherapy.

Kim J, Oh T, Chang W, Jeong Y Med Oncol. 2011; 29(2):1361-4.

PMID: 21380779 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-9887-y.


Risk factors for upper limb deep vein thrombosis associated with the use of central vein catheter in cancer patients.

Verso M, Agnelli G, Kamphuisen P, Ageno W, Bazzan M, Lazzaro A Intern Emerg Med. 2008; 3(2):117-22.

PMID: 18317868 DOI: 10.1007/s11739-008-0125-3.


Risk-assessment algorithm and recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical patients.

Rocha A, Paiva E, Lichtenstein A, Milani Jr R, Cavalheiro C, Maffei F Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007; 3(4):533-53.

PMID: 17969384 PMC: 2291339.