» Articles » PMID: 8204162

Management of Breast Cancer in Southeast England

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1994 Jan 15
PMID 8204162
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the extent to which management of invasive breast cancer reflected consensus guidelines in the Thames regions in 1990.

Design: Population based study of case notes.

Setting: Thames Cancer Registry.

Subjects: All women with breast cancer diagnosed in early 1990 (417 cases) resident in the four Thames regions. Hospital records were traced for 346 cases, of which 12 were ineligible because of misclassification in initial registration and were excluded from the analysis. 334 cases were analysed.

Main Outcome Measures: Investigations and treatment in the six months after diagnosis, stage of disease.

Results: Of the 334 women identified, 86 were aged under 50. Three years after diagnosis, 74 were dead, seven (8%) aged under 50 and 67 (27%) aged 50 or over. Axillary surgery was used to stage cancer in only 155 cases (46%), although this is recommended in the guidelines. Only 79 (24%) case notes had any information recorded on stage. Stage could be determined reliably for only half of the sample. Treatment varied widely within the same age group and stage of disease. In particular, chemotherapy was not routinely given to patients under 50 with stage II disease. Only 17 records showed evidence that the patient was participating in a clinical trial.

Conclusions: There was a lack of consensus on the management of breast cancer among clinicians in 1990. More patients should be included in clinical trials.

Citing Articles

Fraction size in radiation therapy for breast conservation in early breast cancer.

Hickey B, James M, Lehman M, Hider P, Jeffery M, Francis D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 7:CD003860.

PMID: 27425588 PMC: 6457862. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003860.pub4.


Effects of specialisation on treatment and outcomes in screen-detected breast cancers in Wales: cohort study.

Allgood P, Bachmann M Br J Cancer. 2005; 94(1):36-42.

PMID: 16333307 PMC: 2361068. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602894.


Geographical variation in breast cancer survival rates for women diagnosed in England between 1992 and 1994.

Mullee M, De Stavola B, Romanengo M, Coleman M Br J Cancer. 2004; 90(11):2153-6.

PMID: 15150610 PMC: 2409498. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601812.


Why does specialist treatment of breast cancer improve survival? The role of surgical management.

Kingsmore D, Hole D, Gillis C Br J Cancer. 2004; 90(10):1920-5.

PMID: 15138472 PMC: 2409479. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601846.


Using service guidance to shape the delivery of cancer services: experience in the UK.

Haward R Br J Cancer. 2003; 89 Suppl 1:S12-4.

PMID: 12915898 PMC: 2753003. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601079.


References
1.
Day N, Williams D, Khaw K . Breast cancer screening programmes: the development of a monitoring and evaluation system. Br J Cancer. 1989; 59(6):954-8. PMC: 2246734. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1989.203. View

2.
Basnett I, Gill M, Tobias J . Variations in breast cancer management between a teaching and a non-teaching district. Eur J Cancer. 1992; 28A(12):1945-50. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90233-r. View

3.
Gulliford M, Bell J, Bourne H, Petruckevitch A . The reliability of Cancer Registry records. Br J Cancer. 1993; 67(4):819-21. PMC: 1968346. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.149. View

4.
McCarthy M, Bore J . Treatment of breast cancer in two teaching hospitals: a comparison with consensus guidelines. Eur J Cancer. 1991; 27(5):579-82. DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(91)90222-y. View