» Articles » PMID: 8187858

Reaction Time Latencies of Eye and Hand Movements in Single- and Dual-task Conditions

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 8187858
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate whether ocular and hand motor systems operate independently or whether they share processes. Using dual-task methodology, reaction time (RT) latencies of saccadic eye and hand motor responses were measured. In experiment 1, the hand and eye motor systems produced rapid, aimed pointing movements to a visual target, which could occur either to the left or right of a central fixation point. Results showed that RT latencies of the eye response were slower in the dual-task condition than in the single-task condition, whereas the RT latencies of the hand response were virtually the same in both conditions. This interference effect indicated that the ocular and manual motor systems are not operating independently when initiating saccadic eye and goal-directed hand movements. Experiment 2 employed the same experimental paradigm as experiment 1, except for one important modification. Instead of a goal-directed hand movement to the target stimulus, subjects had to make a button-press response with either the index or middle finger of the right hand dependent upon whether the stimulus occurred to the right or left of the control fixation point. The aim of experiment 2 was to investigate the issue whether the observed interference effect in experiment 1 was specific or non-specific (e.g. overhead costs due to coordinating any two responses). The finding that saccadic eye movements and button-press responses in the dual-task condition could be initiated without delay relative to the single-task conditions, supports the specific interference interpretation.

Citing Articles

Validation of an Eye-Foot Coordination Assessment Tool for Children in Dual-Task Condition.

Andrade-Lara K, Huete V, Atero Mata E, Parraga Montilla J, Sanchez J, Marin A J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797255 PMC: 11721327. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010172.


The influence of action on perception spans different effectors.

Bosco A, Sanz Diez P, Filippini M, Fattori P Front Syst Neurosci. 2023; 17:1145643.

PMID: 37205054 PMC: 10185787. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2023.1145643.


The Study of Aviation Safe Incapacitating Device Based on LED Technology with a Smart-Illumination Sensor Unit.

Leuchter J, Hon L, Bloudicek R, Balaz T, Blasch E Sensors (Basel). 2020; 21(1).

PMID: 33375586 PMC: 7795198. DOI: 10.3390/s21010081.


Why is the explicit component of motor adaptation limited in elderly adults?.

Vandevoorde K, Orban de Xivry J J Neurophysiol. 2020; 124(1):152-167.

PMID: 32459553 PMC: 7474453. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00659.2019.


Eye movements as a readout of sensorimotor decision processes.

Fooken J, Spering M J Neurophysiol. 2020; 123(4):1439-1447.

PMID: 32159423 PMC: 7191514. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00622.2019.


References
1.
Fischer B, Rogal L . Eye-hand-coordination in man: a reaction time study. Biol Cybern. 1986; 55(4):253-61. DOI: 10.1007/BF00355600. View

2.
Frens M, Erkelens C . Coordination of hand movements and saccades: evidence for a common and a separate pathway. Exp Brain Res. 1991; 85(3):682-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF00231754. View

3.
Gielen C, van den Heuvel P, Van Gisbergen J . Coordination of fast eye and arm movements in a tracking task. Exp Brain Res. 1984; 56(1):154-61. DOI: 10.1007/BF00237452. View

4.
Reulen J, Marcus J, Koops D, De Vries F, Tiesinga G, Boshuizen K . Precise recording of eye movement: the IRIS technique. Part 1. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1988; 26(1):20-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02441823. View

5.
Prablanc C, Pelisson D, Goodale M . Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. I. Role of retinal feedback of target position in guiding the hand. Exp Brain Res. 1986; 62(2):293-302. DOI: 10.1007/BF00238848. View