Mankowitz P
Rev Philos Psychol. 2024; 15(3):863-883.
PMID: 39553246
PMC: 11561136.
DOI: 10.1007/s13164-023-00684-y.
Federmeier K
Psychophysiology. 2021; 59(1):e13940.
PMID: 34520568
PMC: 9009268.
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13940.
Declerck M, Ozbakar E, Kirk N
PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0257355.
PMID: 34520485
PMC: 8439467.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257355.
Marian V, Hayakawa S, Schroeder S
Brain Lang. 2021; 222:105012.
PMID: 34464828
PMC: 8554070.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105012.
Soskic A, Jovanovic V, Styles S, Kappenman E, Kovic V
Neuropsychol Rev. 2021; 32(3):577-600.
PMID: 34374003
PMC: 9381463.
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-021-09513-4.
Contextual and Spatial Associations Between Objects Interactively Modulate Visual Processing.
Quek G, Peelen M
Cereb Cortex. 2020; 30(12):6391-6404.
PMID: 32754744
PMC: 7609942.
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa197.
Perceptual elaboration paradigm (PEP): A new approach for investigating mental representations of language.
Male A, Gouldthorp B
MethodsX. 2020; 7:100925.
PMID: 32528862
PMC: 7276422.
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100925.
Electrophysiological correlates of masked repetition and conceptual priming for visual objects.
Li B, Gao C, Wang J
Brain Behav. 2019; 9(10):e01415.
PMID: 31557425
PMC: 6790342.
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1415.
Phonological and semantic priming in American Sign Language: N300 and N400 effects.
Meade G, Lee B, Midgley K, Holcomb P, Emmorey K
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2019; 33(9):1092-1106.
PMID: 30662923
PMC: 6335044.
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1446543.
What is your neural function, visual narrative conjunction? Grammar, meaning, and fluency in sequential image processing.
Cohn N, Kutas M
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2017; 2(1):27.
PMID: 28603773
PMC: 5442195.
DOI: 10.1186/s41235-017-0064-5.
When a hit sounds like a kiss: An electrophysiological exploration of semantic processing in visual narrative.
Manfredi M, Cohn N, Kutas M
Brain Lang. 2017; 169:28-38.
PMID: 28242517
PMC: 5465314.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.02.001.
Lexical selection differences between monolingual and bilingual listeners.
Friesen D, Chung-Fat-Yim A, Bialystok E
Brain Lang. 2015; 152:1-13.
PMID: 26684415
PMC: 4713266.
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.11.001.
Top-down modulation of visual processing and knowledge after 250 ms supports object constancy of category decisions.
Schendan H, Ganis G
Front Psychol. 2015; 6:1289.
PMID: 26441701
PMC: 4584963.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01289.
The grammar of visual narrative: Neural evidence for constituent structure in sequential image comprehension.
Cohn N, Jackendoff R, Holcomb P, Kuperberg G
Neuropsychologia. 2014; 64:63-70.
PMID: 25241329
PMC: 4364919.
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.018.
When does word frequency influence written production?.
Baus C, Strijkers K, Costa A
Front Psychol. 2014; 4:963.
PMID: 24399980
PMC: 3870946.
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00963.
A large N400 but no BOLD effect--comparing source activations of semantic priming in simultaneous EEG-fMRI.
Geukes S, Huster R, Wollbrink A, Junghofer M, Zwitserlood P, Dobel C
PLoS One. 2014; 8(12):e84029.
PMID: 24391871
PMC: 3877131.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084029.
Conscious intention to speak proactively facilitates lexical access during overt object naming.
Strijkers K, Holcomb P, Costa A
J Mem Lang. 2013; 65(4):345-362.
PMID: 24039339
PMC: 3770451.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.06.002.
N400 ERPs for actions: building meaning in context.
Amoruso L, Gelormini C, Aboitiz F, Alvarez Gonzalez M, Manes F, Cardona J
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:57.
PMID: 23459873
PMC: 3586681.
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00057.
Event-related potentials to intact and disrupted actions in children and adults.
Pace A, Carver L, Friend M
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013; 116(2):453-70.
PMID: 23374603
PMC: 3766493.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.013.
Is order the defining feature of magnitude representation? An ERP study on learning numerical magnitude and spatial order of artificial symbols.
Zhao H, Chen C, Zhang H, Zhou X, Mei L, Chen C
PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e49565.
PMID: 23185363
PMC: 3501518.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049565.