» Articles » PMID: 8172393

Soft Tissue Facial Profile Changes After Orthodontic Treatment with Four Premolars Extracted

Overview
Journal Angle Orthod
Specialty Dentistry
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 8172393
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A study on the changes occurring in the soft tissue facial profile in a sample of 16 orthodontic female patients treated with extraction of four premolars led to the following observations: (1) The upper and lower lips moved back an average of 3.4 and 3.8 mm to the E line respectively; Sulcus superior and Sulcus inferior moved back an average of 1.6 and 2.3 mm to the E line respectively. (2) The mean change in the labiomental angle after treatment was almost null (0.1 degree). The mean change in the nasolabial angle after treatment showed an increase of 3.7 degrees. There was an important individual variability for both angular measurements. (3) The mean upper and lower lip protrusion relative to the Sn-Pg' line decreased 2.4 and 3.1 mm respectively. (4) The sulcus superior depth measured following Holdaway showed an average decrease of 0.9 mm. The mean changes of the integumental profile of the face relative to the H line after treatment showed that the lower lip moved back an average of 1.4 mm; the distance from Sulcus superior to the H line decreased an average of 2.4 mm, and the distance from Sulcus inferior to the H line increased an average of 0.8 mm. (5) When comparing these changes to acceptable esthetic values for the variables used, we observed that only 12% of patients in our sample finished treatment with a clearly more flattened facial profile. (6) To avoid unesthetic soft tissue profile changes, extraction of premolars should not be performed, if possible, when the pretreatment cephalogram shows any of the following characteristics: Nasolabial angle > or = 110 degrees, Ls to Sn-Pg' line < or = 3 mm, Li to Sn-Pg' line < or = 2 mm, Ss to H line < or = 3 mm, Li to H line < or = 0 mm.

Citing Articles

Correlation Between Cephalometric Values and Soft Tissue Profile in Class I and Class II Adult Patients based on Vertical Patterns.

Farha P, Arqub S, Ghoussoub M Turk J Orthod. 2024; 37(1):36-43.

PMID: 38556951 PMC: 10986451. DOI: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.20.


Evaluation of the relationship between incisor torque and profile aesthetics in patients having orthodontic extractions compared to non-extractions.

Tepedino M, Esposito R, Potrubacz M, Xhanari D, Ciavarella D Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(9):5233-5248.

PMID: 37500932 PMC: 10492872. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05143-7.


Evaluation of the Changes of the Intercanine and Intermolar Widths Following Palatal Expansion in the Mixed Dentition Patients with Bilateral Posterior Crossbite: A Systematic Review.

Lim Y, Baharin F, Lin G, Hassan R, Tsai M, Wei L Dent J (Basel). 2023; 11(2).

PMID: 36826197 PMC: 9955097. DOI: 10.3390/dj11020052.


Comparison of soft tissue changes between incisor tipping and translation after premolar extraction.

Baik W, Choi S, Cha J, Yu H, Lee K Korean J Orthod. 2022; 52(1):42-52.

PMID: 35046141 PMC: 8770962. DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2022.52.1.42.


Extraction vs. Nonextraction on Soft-Tissue Profile Change in Patients with Malocclusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Moon S, Mohamed A, He Y, Dong W, Yaosen C, Yang Y Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021:7751516.

PMID: 34589550 PMC: 8476252. DOI: 10.1155/2021/7751516.