» Articles » PMID: 8149850

Effect of Resistant Starch on Colonic Fermentation, Bile Acid Metabolism, and Mucosal Proliferation

Overview
Journal Dig Dis Sci
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1994 Apr 1
PMID 8149850
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Resistant starch is by definition that part of starch that escapes digestion in the small bowel. Cecal fermentation of resistant starch into short-chain fatty acids will result subsequently in a decrease in pH. Thus, resistant starch may have the same effect on colonic luminal contents and mucosa as some fiber components. We studied the effects of adding 45 g native amylomaize (Hylon-VII) to a standardized diet in 14 healthy volunteers on fermentation and colonic mucosal proliferation. Hylon-VII is a high amylose maize starch, containing 62% resistant starch. During amylomaize consumption, breath hydrogen excretion rose 85% and fecal short chain fatty acid output increased 35% (P < 0.01). Excretion of primary bile acids increased and the soluble deoxycholic acid concentration decreased by 50% (P = 0.002). Subsequently, cytotoxicity of the aqueous phase of feces--as measured on a colon cancer cell line--decreased (P = 0.007). Colonic mucosal proliferation in rectal biopsies (proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunostaining) decreased from 6.7 to 5.4% (P = 0.05). We speculate that resistant starch consumption decreases colonic mucosal proliferation as a result of the decreased formation of cytotoxic secondary bile acids, which is possibly mediated through acidification of the large bowel by production of short-chain fatty acids.

Citing Articles

Dietary jack bean ( L.) supplementation enhanced intestinal health by modulating intestinal integrity and immune responses of broiler chickens.

Madani A, Muhlisin M, Kurniawati A, Baskara A, Al Anas M Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34389.

PMID: 39130426 PMC: 11315099. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34389.


Plasma, urine, and stool metabolites in response to dietary rice bran and navy bean supplementation in adults at high-risk for colorectal cancer.

Hill E, Baxter B, Pfluger B, Slaughter C, Beale M, Smith H Front Gastroenterol (Lausanne). 2024; 2.

PMID: 38469373 PMC: 10927265. DOI: 10.3389/fgstr.2023.1087056.


Dietary resistant starch supplementation increases gut luminal deoxycholic acid abundance in mice.

Reuter M, Tucker M, Marfori Z, Shishani R, Bustamante J, Moreno R Gut Microbes. 2024; 16(1):2315632.

PMID: 38375831 PMC: 10880513. DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2024.2315632.


A comparison of the effects of resistant starch types on glycemic response in individuals with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pugh J, Cai M, Altieri N, Frost G Front Nutr. 2023; 10:1118229.

PMID: 37051127 PMC: 10085630. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1118229.


Resistant starch type-4 intake alters circulating bile acids in human subjects.

Dhakal S, Dey M Front Nutr. 2022; 9:930414.

PMID: 36337613 PMC: 9631925. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.930414.


References
1.
Thornton J, Dryden A, Kelleher J, Losowsky M . Super-efficient starch absorption. A risk factor for colonic neoplasia?. Dig Dis Sci. 1987; 32(10):1088-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF01300193. View

2.
Reddy B, Engle A, Simi B, Goldman M . Effect of dietary fiber on colonic bacterial enzymes and bile acids in relation to colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 1992; 102(5):1475-82. DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(92)91704-8. View

3.
Willett W, Stampfer M, Colditz G, Rosner B, Speizer F . Relation of meat, fat, and fiber intake to the risk of colon cancer in a prospective study among women. N Engl J Med. 1990; 323(24):1664-72. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199012133232404. View

4.
Andrieux C, Gadelle D, Leprince C, SACQUET E . Effects of some poorly digestible carbohydrates on bile acid bacterial transformations in the rat. Br J Nutr. 1989; 62(1):103-19. DOI: 10.1079/bjn19890011. View

5.
Chapman R, Sillery J, Graham M, Saunders D . Absorption of starch by healthy ileostomates: effect of transit time and of carbohydrate load. Am J Clin Nutr. 1985; 41(6):1244-8. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/41.6.1244. View