» Articles » PMID: 8131835

A Bimodal Map of Space: Somatosensory Receptive Fields in the Macaque Putamen with Corresponding Visual Receptive Fields

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1993 Jan 1
PMID 8131835
Citations 109
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The macaque putamen contains neurons that respond to somatosensory stimuli such as light touch, joint movement, or deep muscle pressure. Their receptive fields are arranged to form a map of the body. In the face and arm region of this somatotopic map we found neurons that responded to visual stimuli. Some neurons were bimodal, responding to both visual and somatosensory stimuli, while others were purely visual, or purely somatosensory. The bimodal neurons usually responded to light cutaneous stimulation, rather than to joint movement or deep muscle pressure. They responded to visual stimuli near their tactile receptive field and were not selective for the shape or the color of the stimuli. For cells with tactile receptive fields on the face, the visual receptive field subtended a solid angle extending from the tactile receptive field to about 10 cm. For cells with tactile receptive fields on the arm, the visual receptive field often extended further from the animal. These bimodal properties provide a map of the visual space that immediately surrounds the monkey. The map is organized somatotopically, that is, by body part, rather than retinotopically as in most visual areas. It could function to guide movements in the animal's immediate vicinity. Cortical areas 6, 7b, and VIP contain bimodal cells with very similar properties to those in the putamen. We suggest that the bimodal cells in area 6, 7b, VIP, and the putamen form part of an interconnected system that represents extra personal space in a somatotopic fashion.

Citing Articles

Convergent representation of values from tactile and visual inputs for efficient goal-directed behavior in the primate putamen.

Hwang S, Park D, Lee J, Lee S, Kim H Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):8954.

PMID: 39448643 PMC: 11502908. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53342-x.


Comparison of peripersonal space in front and rear spaces.

Teraoka R, Kuroda N, Kojima R, Teramoto W Exp Brain Res. 2024; 242(4):797-808.

PMID: 38319398 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-024-06782-2.


Visual influence on bimanual haptic slant adaptation.

Glowania C, Ernst M, Hanke S, van Dam L J Vis. 2024; 24(1):8.

PMID: 38206278 PMC: 10787591. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.1.8.


Visual perceptual learning is effective in the illusory far but not in the near space.

Zafarana A, Farne A, Tame L Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(3):1206-1215.

PMID: 37932577 PMC: 11192680. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02389-w.


Subcortical contributions to the sense of body ownership.

Crucianelli L, Reader A, Ehrsson H Brain. 2023; 147(2):390-405.

PMID: 37847057 PMC: 10834261. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad359.


References
1.
Robinson C, Burton H . Organization of somatosensory receptive fields in cortical areas 7b, retroinsula, postauditory and granular insula of M. fascicularis. J Comp Neurol. 1980; 192(1):69-92. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901920105. View

2.
Parthasarathy H, Schall J, Graybiel A . Distributed but convergent ordering of corticostriatal projections: analysis of the frontal eye field and the supplementary eye field in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 1992; 12(11):4468-88. PMC: 6575998. View

3.
Baizer J, Ungerleider L, DeSimone R . Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques. J Neurosci. 1991; 11(1):168-90. PMC: 6575184. View

4.
Kunzle H . An autoradiographic analysis of the efferent connections from premotor and adjacent prefrontal regions (areas 6 and 9) in macaca fascicularis. Brain Behav Evol. 1978; 15(3):185-234. DOI: 10.1159/000123779. View

5.
Rizzolatti G, Camarda R, Fogassi L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M . Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Exp Brain Res. 1988; 71(3):491-507. DOI: 10.1007/BF00248742. View