Experience with Not Offering Dialysis to Patients with a Poor Prognosis
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Despite ongoing discussion of dialysis rationing in the nephrology community, there are little available data describing current practice in treatment selection for very ill renal patients with a poor prognosis. We report a prospective survey of end-stage renal patients referred to our Canadian regional dialysis center who were not accepted to the dialysis program on the grounds of poor prognosis and low quality of life. One quarter of patients referred during 1992 were not accepted to the program, with a mean age of 74 +/- 11 years. Patients were predominantly female and most suffered from a combination of renovascular and cardiovascular disease, with very poor functional capacity as determined by the Karnofsky scale. Nonacceptance to the dialysis program did not create legal difficulties or requests for second opinions. Based on our experience, we propose guidelines for nonacceptance of patients to dialysis programs.
Okada H, Ono A, Tomori K, Inoue T, Hanafusa N, Sakai K PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0302101.
PMID: 38603695 PMC: 11008820. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302101.
Ethical challenges in nephrology: a call for action.
Martin D, Harris D, Jha V, Segantini L, Demme R, Le T Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020; 16(10):603-613.
PMID: 32587403 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-020-0295-4.
Faruque L, Hemmelgarn B, Wiebe N, Manns B, Ravani P, Klarenbach S Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013; 8(8):1327-35.
PMID: 23833317 PMC: 3731909. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.10721012.
Chandna S, Da Silva-Gane M, Marshall C, Warwicker P, Greenwood R, Farrington K Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 26(5):1608-14.
PMID: 21098012 PMC: 3084441. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq630.
Carson R, Juszczak M, Davenport A, Burns A Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 4(10):1611-9.
PMID: 19808244 PMC: 2758251. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.00510109.