» Articles » PMID: 8091236

Obstacles to the Accrual of Patients to Clinical Trials in the Community Setting

Overview
Journal Semin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 1994 Aug 1
PMID 8091236
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Data indicate that substantial pool of candidates exists, especially in the community setting, for enrollment in clinical oncologic trials. However, only a small proportion of cancer patients are actually enrolled. Obstacles to accrual include physician determinants, patient determinants, organizational issues, and health care system factors. Physicians can influence patient enlistment in their capacity as either referring physician or study investigator. A practitioner's medical orientation may impact the likelihood of referral. Physicians reluctant to enroll patients cite logistic and practical problems and the potential for disrupting patient relationships; a trial's protocol also may be questioned. Patient refusals to participate in clinical trials may stem from practical concerns, psychosocial issues, or a wariness of toxic treatment effects. Organizational issues affecting patient accrual have not been extensively studied; an institutional review board's view of research may be a major factor. Health care system factors such as escalating costs and prohibitive reimbursement policies of third-party payers also adversely affect accrual, and will require a new commitment to minimizing protocol costs. Continued evaluation of physician and patient barriers to accrual is warranted. Once these barriers are recognized, randomized intervention trials will be required to identify ways to overcome them.

Citing Articles

"The Truth Is, We Must Miss Some": A Qualitative Study of the Patient Eligibility Screening Process, and Automation Perspectives, for Cancer Clinical Trials.

La Rosa A, Vaterkowski M, Cuggia M, Campillo-Gimenez B, Tournigand C, Baujat B Cancer Med. 2024; 13(23):e70466.

PMID: 39624972 PMC: 11612666. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70466.


Effectiveness of IT-supported patient recruitment: study protocol for an interrupted time series study at ten German university hospitals.

Boeker M, Zoller D, Blasini R, Macho P, Helfer S, Behrens M Trials. 2024; 25(1):125.

PMID: 38365848 PMC: 10870691. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07918-z.


Patient perceptions concerning clinical trials in oncology patients.

Dias A, Chao J, Lee D, Wu Y, Kloecker G Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018; 4:179-185.

PMID: 29736480 PMC: 5935901. DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.09.005.


Application of best practice approaches for designing decision support tools: the preparatory education about clinical trials (PRE-ACT) study.

Fleisher L, Ruggieri D, Miller S, Manne S, Albrecht T, Buzaglo J Patient Educ Couns. 2014; 96(1):63-71.

PMID: 24813474 PMC: 4171039. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.009.


Patterns and predictors of breast cancer chemotherapy use in Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2004-2007.

Kurian A, Lichtensztajn D, Keegan T, Leung R, Shema S, Hershman D Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 137(1):247-60.

PMID: 23139057 PMC: 3769522. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2329-5.