» Articles » PMID: 8081407

Effects of Electrode Size on Basic Excitatory Responses and on Selected Stimulus Parameters

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1994 Jul 1
PMID 8081407
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent data have implicated the size of surface electrodes as an important factor affecting peripheral nerve excitation. Therefore, we studied the effects of electrode size on the basic excitatory responses and on stimulus characteristics. Four different sizes of self-adhesive surface electrodes were applied over the medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscle of 20 healthy subjects. The excitatory levels were sensory threshold, motor threshold, pain threshold, and maximally tolerated painful stimulation. Stimulus parameters included a symmetric biphasic waveform, 200 microseconds phase duration, and a pulse repetition rate of 50 pps. Amplitude was increased until the appropriate excitatory response was achieved. At this amplitude level, the computerized recording system collected data of stimulus peak current, peak voltage, and phase charge as well as isometric plantar flexion force. Repeated measure analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls post hoc tests revealed that increasing electrode size significantly decreased voltage but increased current and phase charge magnitudes. With increasing electrode area, the ratios of voltage/current decreased nonlinearly, while the ratios of charge/voltage increased nonlinearly. The comfort of stimulation for the same amount of plantar flexion force improved significantly as electrode size became larger. We concluded that electrode size affects the stimulus parameters, comfort, and force generation associated with electrically induced excitatory responses. Electrode size should be considered an integral part of the attempt to improve subject response to transcutaneous electrical stimulation.

Citing Articles

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation during maximal voluntary contraction: a Delphi survey with expert consensus.

Osborne J, Tallent J, Girard O, Marshall P, Kidgell D, Buhmann R Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 123(10):2203-2212.

PMID: 37247005 PMC: 10492693. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05232-1.


Effect of Athletic Training on Fatigue During Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation.

Abitante T, Rutkove S, Duda K, Newman D Front Sports Act Living. 2022; 4:894395.

PMID: 35774382 PMC: 9237484. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2022.894395.


Effects of electrode size and placement on comfort and efficiency during low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation of quadriceps, hamstrings and gluteal muscles.

Flodin J, Juthberg R, Ackermann P BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022; 14(1):11.

PMID: 35034633 PMC: 8761348. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00403-7.


A Comparison of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Parameters for Postoperative Quadriceps Strength in Patients After Knee Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Conley C, Mattacola C, Jochimsen K, Dressler E, Lattermann C, Howard J Sports Health. 2021; 13(2):116-127.

PMID: 33428557 PMC: 8167342. DOI: 10.1177/1941738120964817.


Stimulation of paralysed quadriceps muscles with sequentially and spatially distributed electrodes during dynamic knee extension.

Laubacher M, Aksoez E, Brust A, Baumberger M, Riener R, Binder-Macleod S J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019; 16(1):5.

PMID: 30616683 PMC: 6322281. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0471-y.