» Articles » PMID: 8059807

Abdominal Hysterectomy Versus Transvaginal Morcellation for the Removal of Enlarged Uteri

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 1994 Aug 1
PMID 8059807
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the intraoperative and postoperative complications of transvaginal morcellation and abdominal hysterectomy for the removal of moderately enlarged uteri.

Study Design: An observational study was performed on all uteri weighing > 200 gm removed transvaginally from July 1, 1987, to June 30, 1993. An abdominal hysterectomy control group was selected.

Results: There were 50 patients in the vaginal group and 112 in the abdominal group. At a p value < 0.05 there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for age, parity, obesity, hypertension, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, or prior genitourinary surgery. The mean operative time in the vaginal hysterectomy group was 122 minutes and in the abdominal hysterectomy group 148 minutes (p < 0.05). The mean estimated blood loss was 527 and 586 ml, respectively (not significant). Twenty-two percent of the vaginal group and 70% of the abdominal group underwent bilateral oophorectomy (p < 0.05). The mean uterine weights were 335 and 336 gm, respectively (not significant). The mean day of starting a regular diet was 2.1 and 3.6, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean day of discharge was 3.6 and 5.1, respectively (p < 0.05). Complications were similar for the two groups.

Conclusions: In selected patients transvaginal morcellation is a safe and effective alternative to abdominal hysterectomy for the removal of moderately enlarged uteri. The two procedures are comparable in operative time, blood loss, and complications. Both ovaries are more likely to be removed with abdominal hysterectomy. Cosmesis and recuperation may be advantages of the vaginal approach.

Citing Articles

Comparative Study of Vaginal Hysterectomy and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy in Non-descent Uterus in a Rural Tertiary Care Center.

Alamelu D, K R B, D S, S V Cureus. 2023; 15(3):e36017.

PMID: 37050998 PMC: 10084913. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36017.


An Observational Study Comparing Hybrid Transvaginal Notes and Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Ansari A, Kaushal G, Dhillon K Cureus. 2023; 15(1):e33589.

PMID: 36779164 PMC: 9910032. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33589.


Vaginal morcellation through the posterior cul-de-sac using an electromechanical morcellator after laparoscopic myomectomy or subtotal hysterectomy: a retrospective, case-control study.

Lee E, Kim D Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(11):4865-4870.

PMID: 26895917 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4821-1.


Systematic analysis of the safety and benefits of transvaginal hybrid-NOTES cholecystectomy.

Bulian D, Knuth J, Lehmann K, Sauerwald A, Heiss M World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(38):10915-25.

PMID: 26478683 PMC: 4600593. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i38.10915.


The prevalence of occult leiomyosarcoma at surgery for presumed uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis.

Pritts E, Vanness D, Berek J, Parker W, Feinberg R, Feinberg J Gynecol Surg. 2015; 12(3):165-177.

PMID: 26283890 PMC: 4532723. DOI: 10.1007/s10397-015-0894-4.