» Articles » PMID: 8052669

Cross-language Differences in Phonological Acquisition: Swedish and American /t/

Overview
Journal Phonetica
Publisher De Gruyter
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 8052669
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Our understanding of phonological acquisition has benefited immensely from cross-linguistic investigations which allow researchers to separate biological and learned factors. To date, most cross-linguistic studies have focused either on differences in phonetic inventories or on differences in frequency of occurrence of particular phonetic and phonological properties in the adult language. This paper describes a third type of study: comparisons of segments that occur in two (or more) languages but differ in their phonetic properties. We present perceptual and acoustic analyses of adult and child productions of word-initial alveolar /t/ in American English and dental /t/ in Swedish. Results showed that listeners' perception of place of articulation was strongly associated with language (alveolar: American English, dental: Swedish) for both adult and child tokens, and was effective in assigning individual speakers to language groups. Three acoustic measures, voice onset time, burst intensity and burst spectral diffuseness correlated with language for both child and adult tokens; the latter two measures correlated with perception as well. The findings suggest that American and Swedish children at 30 months of age have acquired some language-specific phonetic aspects of /t/ phonemes.

Citing Articles

Methods for eliciting, annotating, and analyzing databases for child speech development.

Beckman M, Plummer A, Munson B, Reidy P Comput Speech Lang. 2017; 45:278-299.

PMID: 28943715 PMC: 5608260. DOI: 10.1016/j.csl.2017.02.010.


Framing a socio-indexical basis for the emergence and cultural transmission of phonological systems.

Plummer A, Beckman M J Phon. 2016; 53:66-78.

PMID: 26834297 PMC: 4730900. DOI: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.004.


Auditory-perceptual learning improves speech motor adaptation in children.

Shiller D, Rochon M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014; 40(4):1308-15.

PMID: 24842067 PMC: 4433313. DOI: 10.1037/a0036660.


Language-specific developmental differences in speech production: a cross-language acoustic study.

Li F Child Dev. 2012; 83(4):1303-15.

PMID: 22540834 PMC: 3596111. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01773.x.


What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations.

McMurray B, Jongman A Psychol Rev. 2011; 118(2):219-46.

PMID: 21417542 PMC: 3523696. DOI: 10.1037/a0022325.