Randomized Comparison of High-dose and Low-dose Intravenous Interleukin-2 for the Therapy of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: an Interim Report
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: A randomized prospective study was performed to compare the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose intravenous bolus interleukin-2 (IL-2) and a lower-dose intravenous bolus regimen for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Patients And Methods: Between March 1991 and April 1993, 125 patients with metastatic RCC were randomized to receive IL-2 by intravenous bolus every 8 hours at either 720,000 IU/kg (high-dose) or 72,000 IU/kg (low-dose) to the maximum-tolerated number of doses (or a maximum of 15 doses). After approximately 7 to 10 days, both treatment groups were re-treated with a second identical cycle of therapy. Those patients who were stable or responding to treatment 5 to 6 weeks later went on to receive re-treatment with another course (two cycles) of therapy. Response rates and toxicity were determined for the two treatment arms.
Results: One hundred twenty-five patients received a total of 208 courses of therapy. Sixty patients were randomized to receive low-dose, and 65 to receive high-dose IL-2. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. There was a greater incidence of grade III or IV thrombocytopenia, malaise, and hypotension in patients who received high-dose IL-2, while patients who received low-dose IL-2 had significantly more infections. Three percent of treatment courses with low-dose IL-2 required vasopressor support, compared with 52% of courses with high-dose IL-2. Patients who received low-dose IL-2 had a 7% complete response (CR) and an 8% partial response (PR) rate, and patients who received high-dose IL-2 had a 3% CR and a 17% PR rate.
Conclusion: Low-dose intravenous bolus IL-2 represents an effective regimen for the treatment of metastatic RCC, with preliminary results comparable to those observed with high-dose IL-2. Low-dose IL-2 can be administered with significantly fewer complications, reduced use of vasopressor support, and fewer admissions to an intensive care unit (ICU).
Exploring the Pathogenic Role and Therapeutic Implications of Interleukin 2 in Autoimmune Hepatitis.
Czaja A Dig Dis Sci. 2020; 66(8):2493-2512.
PMID: 32833154 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06562-2.
Current Status and Future Directions of Immunotherapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Considine B, Hurwitz M Curr Oncol Rep. 2019; 21(4):34.
PMID: 30848378 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0779-1.
Targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma.
Posadas E, Limvorasak S, Figlin R Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017; 13(8):496-511.
PMID: 28691713 DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.82.
Huang H, Menefee M, Edgerly M, Zhuang S, Kotz H, Poruchynsky M Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16(5):1634-41.
PMID: 20179242 PMC: 7006234. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0379.
Stein W, Huang H, Menefee M, Edgerly M, Kotz H, Dwyer A Cancer J. 2009; 15(5):441-7.
PMID: 19826366 PMC: 3667552. DOI: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181be1b90.