» Articles » PMID: 8004759

Quantification of Topoisomerase-DNA Complexes in Leukemia Cells from Patients Undergoing Therapy with a Topoisomerase-directed Agent

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 8004759
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several clinically important drugs utilized in cancer chemotherapy inhibit type I (Topotecan) or type II (amsacrine, etoposide) DNA topoisomerases by stabilizing the formation of DNA-topoisomerase complexes (topoisomerase-DNA cross-links). In various cell lines, the magnitude of drug-induced DNA-protein cross-link production correlates with the magnitude of cytotoxicity induced by the drugs. We developed a simple filter-binding assay that can measure drug-induced DNA-protein cross-links in leukemia cells obtained directly from patients because the assays most widely used for assessment of drug-induced DNA-protein cross-links in cells [sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)/KCl precipitation and alkaline elution] are not readily applicable for use on patient material. HL-60 human leukemia cells or freshly isolated patients' leukemia cells were incubated with Topotecan, etoposide, or amsacrine; lysed with SDS; and applied to nitrocellulose filters in a low-salt buffer. DNA is retained on the filter only if it is covalently bound to protein. The amount of DNA retained on the filter is quantified by hybridization to the alu sequence of DNA, which is distributed ubiquitously in the human genome. Using radiolabeled cells, we compared the filter-binding assay directly with the SDS/KCl precipitation assay in the detection of etoposide- or amsacrine-induced DNA-protein cross-links in HL-60 cells and amsacrine-resistant HL-60/AMSA cells. Both the SDS/KCl precipitation assay and the filter-binding assay detected etoposide-induced DNA-protein cross-links in HL-60 and HL-60/AMSA cells and detected a greater frequency of amsacrine-induced DNA-protein cross-links in HL-60 cells than in HL-60/AMSA cells. The filter-binding assay detected DNA-protein cross-links in freshly isolated leukemia cells exposed to Topotecan in vitro. The ratios of DNA retention for Topotecan-treated versus untreated cells from leukemia patients ranged from 1.8 to 11.5. The heterogeneity of this detected cross-linking was as might be expected if the assay were predictive of the antileukemic action of Topotecan, which is variable. This new filter-binding technique may be useful for predicting the sensitivity of individual patients' tumors to drugs that inhibit type I or type II DNA topoisomerases.

Citing Articles

Method for quantifying expression of functionally active topoisomerase II in patients with leukaemia.

Cattan A, Levett D, Douglas E, Middleton P, Taylor P J Clin Pathol. 1996; 49(10):848-52.

PMID: 8943755 PMC: 500783. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.49.10.848.


Topoisomerase expression in cancer cell lines and clinical samples.

Doyle L Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1994; 34 Suppl:S32-40.

PMID: 8070025 DOI: 10.1007/BF00684861.

References
1.
Zwelling L, Michaels S, Erickson L, Ungerleider R, Nichols M, Kohn K . Protein-associated deoxyribonucleic acid strand breaks in L1210 cells treated with the deoxyribonucleic acid intercalating agents 4'-(9-acridinylamino) methanesulfon-m-anisidide and adriamycin. Biochemistry. 1981; 20(23):6553-63. DOI: 10.1021/bi00526a006. View

2.
Coombs D, Pearson G . Filter-binding assay for covalent DNA-protein complexes: adenovirus DNA-terminal protein complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978; 75(11):5291-5. PMC: 392948. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.75.11.5291. View

3.
Tan K, Mattern M, Eng W, McCabe F, Johnson R . Nonproductive rearrangement of DNA topoisomerase I and II genes: correlation with resistance to topoisomerase inhibitors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989; 81(22):1732-5. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/81.22.1732. View

4.
Kaufmann S, Karp J, Jones R, Miller C, Schneider E, Zwelling L . Topoisomerase II levels and drug sensitivity in adult acute myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 1994; 83(2):517-30. View

5.
Zwelling L . DNA topoisomerase II as a target of antineoplastic drug therapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1985; 4(4):263-76. DOI: 10.1007/BF00048092. View