» Articles » PMID: 7984403

Behavioral Estimates of Interhemispheric Transmission Time and the Signal Detection Method: a Reappraisal

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 1994 Oct 1
PMID 7984403
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

On the basis of a review of the literature, Bashore (1981) concluded that only simple reaction time experiments with manual responses yielded consistent behavioral estimates of interhemispheric transmission time. A closer look at the data, however, revealed that these experiments were the only ones in which large numbers of observations were invariably obtained from many subjects. To investigate whether the methodological flaw was the origin of Bashore's conclusion, two experiments were run in which subjects had to react to lateralized light flashes. The first experiment dealt with manual reactions, the second with verbal reactions. Each experiment included a condition without catch trials (i.e., simple reaction time) and two conditions with catch trials. Catch trials were trials in which no stimulus was given and in which the response was to be withheld. Both experiments returned consistent estimates of interhemispheric transmission time in the range of 2-3 msec. No differences were found between the simple reaction time condition and the signal detection conditions with catch trials. Data were analyzed according to the variable criterion theory. This showed that the effect of catch trials, as well as the effect of interhemispheric transmission, was situated at the height of the detection criterion, and not in the rate of the information transmission.

Citing Articles

Why free choices take longer than forced choices: evidence from response threshold manipulations.

Naefgen C, Dambacher M, Janczyk M Psychol Res. 2017; 82(6):1039-1052.

PMID: 28776264 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0887-1.


Visual and tactile interhemispheric transfer compared with the method of Poffenberger.

Fendrich R, Hutsler J, Gazzaniga M Exp Brain Res. 2004; 158(1):67-74.

PMID: 15054567 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-1873-6.

References
1.
Hawkins H, Shafto M, Richardson K . Effects of target luminance and cue validity on the latency of visual detection. Percept Psychophys. 1988; 44(5):484-92. DOI: 10.3758/bf03210434. View

2.
Wale J, Geffen G . Focused and divided attention in each half of space with disconnected hemispheres. Cortex. 1989; 25(1):33-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(89)80004-8. View

3.
Lines C, Milner A . Nasotemporal overlap in the human retina investigated by means of simple reaction time to lateralized light flash. Exp Brain Res. 1983; 50(2-3):166-72. DOI: 10.1007/BF00239180. View

4.
Berlucchi G, HERON W, HYMAN R, Rizzolatti G, Umilta C . Simple reaction times of ipsilateral and contralateral hand to lateralized visual stimuli. Brain. 1971; 94(3):419-30. DOI: 10.1093/brain/94.3.419. View

5.
Geffen G, Bradshaw J, Wallace G . Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal visual stimuli. J Exp Psychol. 1971; 87(3):415-22. DOI: 10.1037/h0030525. View