» Articles » PMID: 7971115

Apparent Misalignment of Oblique Coplanar Bars in Depth

Overview
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 1994 Aug 1
PMID 7971115
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Following preliminary observations of apparent misalignment of coplanar surfaces in a three-dimensional (3-D) form of the Poggendorff figure viewed in depth, the effect was investigated in five experiments and compared with the 2-D Poggendorff effect in the same object in a sixth. The effect in depth occurred with the complete object when it was viewed binocularly but did not do so with the oblique bars alone or when the object was viewed monocularly. The effect did not vary with oblique-parallel angles of 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees and was absent when the angle was 90 degrees. It varied as a function of the distance between the parallels, but was unaffected by a regular pattern on the oblique bars. A smaller 2-D Poggendorff effect occurred when the upper edges of the object were viewed from above. Although the depth effect was robust, its variance was high compared with that of the 2-D effect, indicating that acuity for misalignments of oblique elements in depth is poor. An explanation of apparent misalignment of oblique elements in 2-D and 3-D space in terms of a perceptual compromise between alignment in an oblique axis and separation relative to the axes of the parallels is proposed.

Citing Articles

Misalignment effects in 3-D versions of Poggendorff displays.

Liu C, Kennedy J Percept Psychophys. 1995; 57(3):409-15.

PMID: 7770331 DOI: 10.3758/bf03213065.

References
1.
Daniels V, Gordon I . Occlusion and the distortion of alignment in three-dimensional space. Perception. 1993; 22(9):1037-44. DOI: 10.1068/p221037. View

2.
Gordon I, Day R, Dorwood F . A Müller-Lyer-type illusion of egocentric distance with 3D convex and concave objects. Scand J Psychol. 1993; 34(2):97-106. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.1993.tb01105.x. View

3.
Hotope W, Ollerearnshaw C . The regression to right angels tendency and the Poggendorff illusion. II. Br J Psychol. 1972; 63(3):369-79. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1972.tb01284.x. View

4.
Anton B . Poggendorff illusion as a function of orientation of transversal and parallel lines. Percept Mot Skills. 1976; 43(1):83-90. DOI: 10.2466/pms.1976.43.1.83. View

5.
LEIBOWITZ H . Some factors influencing the variability of vernier adjustments. Am J Psychol. 1955; 68(2):266-73. View