» Articles » PMID: 7959193

Clinical Courses and Predictors for Rebleeding in Patients with Peptic Ulcers and Non-bleeding Visible Vessels: a Prospective Study

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1994 Oct 1
PMID 7959193
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Detailed characterisation of non-bleeding visible vessels in terms of colour, size evolution, and time of rebleeding is important in determining the natural history of these lesions. The colour and size of non-bleeding visible vessels were observed endoscopically every day for three days and then every other day until rebleeding or flattening of visible vessels occurred in 140 patients. Rebleeding happened in 61 (44%) patients. Of them, 59 (97%) rebled within 72 hours. Flattening of visible vessels happened in 79 (56%) patients and 77 of 79 (98%) had flattening of visible vessels within 72 hours. Rebleeding rate increased with increasing length of exposed vessels (r = 0.96, p < 0.001). Coffee ground fluid or blood retention in the stomach and ulcer size > or = 2.0 cm were independent predictors for rebleeding using multivariate analysis. It is suggested that patients with non-bleeding visible vessels and independent predictors for rebleeding may need early aggressive treatment.

Citing Articles

Early Risk Score for Predicting Hypotension in Normotensive Patients with Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleedin.

Ko B, Kim Y, Jung D, Sohn C, Seo D, Lee Y J Clin Med. 2019; 8(1).

PMID: 30609708 PMC: 6352164. DOI: 10.3390/jcm8010037.


Risk factors determining the need for second-look endoscopy for peptic ulcer bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis and proton pump inhibitor infusion.

Cheng H, Wu C, Chen W, Yang E, Chen P, Sheu B Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4(3):E255-62.

PMID: 27004241 PMC: 4798837. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-111499.


Upper gastrointestinal bleeding risk scores: Who, when and why?.

Monteiro S, Curdia Goncalves T, Magalhaes J, Cotter J World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2016; 7(1):86-96.

PMID: 26909231 PMC: 4753192. DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v7.i1.86.


Risk Factors Associated with Rebleeding in Patients with High Risk Peptic Ulcer Bleeding: Focusing on the Role of Second Look Endoscopy.

Kim S, Lee S, Kim K, Jang B, Kim T, Jeon S Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 61(2):517-22.

PMID: 26297133 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3846-y.


Timing of rebleeding in high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding after successful hemostasis: a systematic review.

El Ouali S, Barkun A, Martel M, Maggio D Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 28(10):543-8.

PMID: 25390616 PMC: 4234354. DOI: 10.1155/2014/324967.


References
1.
Jensen H, Hoffmann J, Wille-Jorgensen P . High gastric ulcer. World J Surg. 1987; 11(3):325-32. DOI: 10.1007/BF01658110. View

2.
Bornman P, Theodorou N, Shuttleworth R, Essel H, Marks I . Importance of hypovolaemic shock and endoscopic signs in predicting recurrent haemorrhage from peptic ulceration: a prospective evaluation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985; 291(6490):245-7. PMC: 1416867. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.291.6490.245. View

3.
Jones P, Johnston S, McEwan A, Kyle J, Needham C . Further haemorrhage after admission to hospital for gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Br Med J. 1973; 3(5882):660-4. PMC: 1586994. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.3.5882.660. View

4.
Panes J, Viver J, Forne M, Marco C, Garau J . Controlled trial of endoscopic sclerosis in bleeding peptic ulcers. Lancet. 1987; 2(8571):1292-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91191-3. View

5.
Allan R, Dykes P . A study of the factors influencing mortality rates from gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Q J Med. 1976; 45(180):533-50. View