Likelihood Ratios: a Real Improvement for Clinical Decision Making?

Overview

Journal Eur J Epidemiol

Specialty Public Health

Date 1994 Feb 1

PMID 7957786

Citations 24

Authors

B Dujardin

J van den Ende

A VAN Gompel

J P Unger

P Van der Stuyft

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The concept of likelihood ratio has been advocated for several years as one of the better means to evaluate diagnostic tests and as a practical and valuable tool in clinical decision making. In this paper we review the basic concepts underlying the evaluation of diagnostic tests and we explore the properties and usefulness of both positive and negative likelihood ratios compared with sensitivity and specificity. Particular attention is given to the use of likelihood ratios in the clinical setting. Likelihood ratios have three main advantages: they are intuitive, they simplify the predictive value calculation and the overall evaluation of sequential testing. Disadvantages are the non-linearity and the necessity to recalculate probabilities in odds. Although they summarize the information contained in sensitivity and specificity, these characteristics are still necessary for certain clinical decisions. Since likelihood ratios have been promoted among physicians and medical students, we discuss examples of inappropriate use and misunderstandings in the medical literature: the frequent omission of confidence intervals, the choice of cut-off points based on likelihood ratios for positive test results only and the confusion between likelihood ratios for ranges and those for cut-off points.

Citing Articles

Influence of Pathophysiologic Patterns of Coronary Artery Disease on Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes.

Collet C, Munhoz D, Mizukami T, Sonck J, Matsuo H, Shinke T Circulation. 2024; 150(8):586-597.

PMID: 38742491 PMC: 11335079. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.069450.

The diagnostic likelihood ratio function and modified test for trend: Identifying, evaluating, and validating nontraditional biomarkers in case-control studies.

Lindner H, Gimotty P, Bilker W Stat Med. 2023; 42(29):5313-5337.

PMID: 37735925 PMC: 11073617. DOI: 10.1002/sim.9912.

Mobile application-based oximetry: a potential toolfor appropriate referral of patients with respiratory symptoms examined via telemedicine.

Paladino F, Augusto Duenhas Accorsi T, Gueuvoghlanian-Silva B, Almeida M, Barbosa J, Oliveira Filho M Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2023; 21:eAO0025.

PMID: 36629679 PMC: 9785575. DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AO0025.

Diagnostic Value of Acromiohumeral Distance in Rotator Cuff Pathology: Implications for Advanced-Practice Physiotherapists.

Razmjou H, Palinkas V, Christakis M, Kennedy D, Robarts S Physiother Can. 2021; 72(1):52-62.

PMID: 34385749 PMC: 8330982. DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0084.

Assessing the likelihood of obstructive sleep apnea: a comparison of nine screening questionnaires.

Prasad K, Sehgal I, Agarwal R, Aggarwal A, Behera D, Dhooria S Sleep Breath. 2017; 21(4):909-917.

PMID: 28365841 DOI: 10.1007/s11325-017-1495-4.

References

Cochrane A, Holland W . Validation of screening procedures. Br Med Bull. 1971; 27(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070810. View

Radack K, Rouan G, Hedges J . The likelihood ratio. An improved measure for reporting and evaluating diagnostic test results. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986; 110(8):689-93. View

Linnet K . Precision of sensitivity estimations in diagnostic test evaluations. Power functions for comparisons of sensitivities of two tests. Clin Chem. 1985; 31(4):574-80. View

Thornton J, Lilford R, Johnson N . Decision analysis in medicine. BMJ. 1992; 304(6834):1099-103. PMC: 1881931. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6834.1099. View

Beck J . Likelihood ratios. Another enhancement of sensitivity and specificity. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1986; 110(8):685-6. View

Fletcher R . Carcinoembryonic antigen. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 104(1):66-73. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-104-1-66. View

Sheps S, Schechter M . The assessment of diagnostic tests. A survey of current medical research. JAMA. 1984; 252(17):2418-22. View

Leung F, Galbraith L, Jablonsky G, Henderson A . Re-evaluation of the diagnostic utility of serum total creatine kinase and creatine kinase-2 in myocardial infarction. Clin Chem. 1989; 35(7):1435-40. View

Bulpitt C . Confidence intervals. Lancet. 1987; 1(8531):494-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92100-3. View

10.

Pauker S, Kopelman R . How sure is sure enough?. N Engl J Med. 1992; 326(10):688-91. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199203053261007. View

11.

Albert A . On the use and computation of likelihood ratios in clinical chemistry. Clin Chem. 1982; 28(5):1113-9. View

12.

Simel D . Playing the odds. Lancet. 1985; 1(8424):329-30. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)91093-1. View

13.

Fagan T . Letter: Nomogram for Bayes's theorem. N Engl J Med. 1975; 293(5):257. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197507312930513. View

14.

Seymour D, Green M, Vaz F . Making better decisions: construction of clinical scoring systems by the Spiegelhalter-Knill-Jones approach. BMJ. 1990; 300(6719):223-6. PMC: 1662045. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6719.223. View

15.

Lacher D . Predictive value derived from likelihood ratios: a superior technic to interpret quantitative laboratory results. Am J Clin Pathol. 1987; 87(5):673-6. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/87.5.673. View

16.

Goldstein B, Mushlin A . Use of a single thyroxine test to evaluate ambulatory medical patients for suspected hypothyroidism. J Gen Intern Med. 1987; 2(1):20-4. DOI: 10.1007/BF02596245. View

17.

Linnet K . A review on the methodology for assessing diagnostic tests. Clin Chem. 1988; 34(7):1379-86. View

18.

Giard R, Hermans J . Interpretation of diagnostic cytology with likelihood ratios. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1990; 114(8):852-4. View

19.

Guyatt G, Patterson C, Ali M, Singer J, Levine M, Turpie I . Diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemia in the elderly. Am J Med. 1990; 88(3):205-9. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(90)90143-2. View

20.

Simel D, Samsa G, Matchar D . Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44(8):763-70. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90128-v. View