[Control of Arterial Hypertension: Effectiveness of an Intervention Performed by Family Practitioners]

Overview

Journal Can Fam Physician

Specialties General Medicine
Public Health

Date 1994 Oct 1

PMID 7950469

Authors

M Aubin

L Vezina

J Maziade

N M Robitaille

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a program to improve hypertension control practices in primary care.

Design: Retrospective quasi-experimental study.

Setting: Three hospital-based family medicine centres (FMCs)

Participants: Two study groups of 100 randomly-selected adult patients each, who visited the study FMC before implementation of the hypertension program (from April 1, 1983 to March 31, 1984) or afterward (from April 1, 1986 to March 31, 1987). These patients were compared to patients from control FMCs A and B seen during the same time frames (100 patients before and after at FMC A and 60 at FMC B).

Interventions: 1) Educational sessions for physicians to standardize knowledge of the recommendations of the Canadian Hypertension Society on hypertension treatment and 2) specific operational incentives to improve hypertension control, including a reference guide placed in each physician's office, a specific hypertension follow-up form placed with each patient's chart, a recall card file, and hypertension information handouts.

Main Outcome Measure: Blood pressure measurements recorded in patient charts. Hypertension control is determined from the Canadian Hypertension Society recommendations.

Results: The hypertension control rate was 52% in the study group before program implementation and 34.3% afterward (p = 0.01); the corresponding rates in the two control groups moved from 47.4% to 59.8% (p > 0.05) in Group A and from 40.7% to 39.3% (p > 0.05) in Group B. Patients listed in the recall card file were not controlled more frequently (33.3%) than those not listed (35.3%).

Conclusion: This intervention did not improve physician practice regarding hypertension control. Clinicians did not follow the protocol as recommended. Physicians must be convinced that a change in their practice is needed before any specific strategies are introduced to support the change. Different suggestions and alternatives related to hypertension management are discussed.

References

Gordon T, Kannel W . Predisposition to atherosclerosis in the head, heart, and legs. The Framingham study. JAMA. 1972; 221(7):661-6. View

Aubin M, Vezina L, Fortin J, BERNARD P . [An effective intervention project for arterial hypertension screening in family medicine]. Union Med Can. 1992; 121(4):227-32. View

Stein L . Education of residents. JAMA. 1981; 246(12):1299. DOI: 10.1001/jama.1981.03320120011005. View

Robitaille N, Dagenais G, Rochon J, Lupien P . [Incidence of arterial hypertension in the Quebec region]. Clin Invest Med. 1983; 6(1):39-42. View

Barnett G, Winickoff R, Morgan M, Zielstorff R . A computer-based monitoring system for follow-up of elevated blood pressure. Med Care. 1983; 21(4):400-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198304000-00003. View

Wong E, McCarron M, Shaw Jr S . Ordering of laboratory tests in a teaching hospital. Can it be improved?. JAMA. 1983; 249(22):3076-80. View

Rosser W . Using the perception-reality gap to alter prescribing patterns. J Med Educ. 1983; 58(9):728-32. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198309000-00008. View

Sanazaro P . Determining physicians' performance. Continuing medical education and other interacting variables. Eval Health Prof. 1983; 6(2):197-210. DOI: 10.1177/016327878300600205. View

Diehr P, Williams S, Martin D, Price K . Ambulatory mental health services utilization in three provider plans. Med Care. 1984; 22(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198401000-00001. View

10.

Dunn E, Hilditch J, Chipman M, Hardacre G, Morrison M . Diagnosis and management of hypertension: the stated practices of family physicians. Can Med Assoc J. 1984; 130(8):985-8. PMC: 1876065. View

11.

Winickoff R, Coltin K, Morgan M, Buxbaum R, Barnett G . Improving physician performance through peer comparison feedback. Med Care. 1984; 22(6):527-34. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198406000-00003. View

12.

Marton K, Tul V, Sox Jr H . Modifying test-ordering behavior in the outpatient medical clinic. A controlled trial of two educational interventions. Arch Intern Med. 1985; 145(5):816-21. View

13.

Lichtenstein M, Shipley M, Rose G . Systolic and diastolic blood pressures as predictors of coronary heart disease mortality in the Whitehall study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985; 291(6490):243-5. PMC: 1416862. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.291.6490.243. View

14.

Evans C, Haynes R, Birkett N, Gilbert J, Taylor D, Sackett D . Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance? Results of a randomized trial in antihypertensive care. JAMA. 1986; 255(4):501-4. View

15.

Bass M, McWhinney I, Donner A . Do family physicians need medical assistants to detect and manage hypertension?. CMAJ. 1986; 134(11):1247-55. PMC: 1491080. View

16.

Lombard J, Cowley Jr A . Hemodynamics and microcirculatory alterations in reduced renal mass hypertension. Hypertension. 1989; 13(2):128-38. DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.13.2.128. View

17.

Putnam R, Curry L . Physicians' participation in establishing criteria for hypertension management in the office: will patient outcomes be improved?. CMAJ. 1989; 140(7):806-9. PMC: 1268807. View

18.

Mann K, Putnam R . Physicians' perceptions of their role in cardiovascular risk reduction. Prev Med. 1989; 18(1):45-58. DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(89)90053-4. View

19.

Macmahon S, Peto R, Cutler J, Collins R, Sorlie P, Neaton J . Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease. Part 1, Prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias. Lancet. 1990; 335(8692):765-74. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90878-9. View

20.

Sytkowski P, Kannel W, DAgostino R . Changes in risk factors and the decline in mortality from cardiovascular disease. The Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med. 1990; 322(23):1635-41. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199006073222304. View