» Articles » PMID: 7932780

Analysis of Directional Mutation Pressure and Nucleotide Content in Mitochondrial Cytochrome B Genes

Overview
Journal J Mol Evol
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 1994 Aug 1
PMID 7932780
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a new approach for analyzing directional mutation pressure and nucleotide content in protein-coding genes. Directional mutation pressure, the heterogenicity in the likelihood of different nucleotide substitutions, is used to explain the increasing or decreasing guanine-cytosine content (GC%) in DNA and is represented by microD, in agreement with Sueoka (1962, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 48:582-592). The new method uses simulation to facilitate identification of significant A+T or G+C pressure as well as the comparison of directional mutation pressure among genes, even when they are translated by different genetic codes. We use the method to analyze the evolution of directional mutation pressure and nucleotide content of mitochondrial cytochrome b genes. Results from a survey of 110 taxa indicate that the cytochrome b genes of most taxa are subjected to significant directional mutation pressure and that the gene is subject to A+T pressure in most cases. Only in the anseriform bird Cairina moschata is the cytochrome b gene subject to significant G+C pressure. The GC% at nonsynonymous codon sites decreases proportionately with increasing A+T pressure, and with a slope less than one, indicating a presence of selective constraints. The cytochrome b genes of insects, nematodes, and eumycotes are subject to extreme A+T pressures (microD = 0.123, 0.224, and 0.130) and, in parallel, the GC% of the nonsynonymous codon sites has decreased from about 0.44 in organisms that are not subjected to A+T or G+C pressure to about 0.332, 0.323, and 0.367, respectively. The distribution of taxa according to the GC% at nonsynonymous codon sites and directional mutation pressure supports the notion that variation in these parameters is a phylogenetic component.

Citing Articles

The Mitochondrial Genome of Melipona fasciculata (Apidae, Meliponini): Genome Organization and Comparative Analyses, Phylogenetic Implications and Divergence Time Estimations.

da Silva G, de Brito Souza I, de Mello Pereira F, de Almeida Souza B, do Rego Lopes M, Prosdocimi F Biochem Genet. 2024; .

PMID: 39643768 DOI: 10.1007/s10528-024-10991-3.


Distinguishing Genetic Drift from Selection in Papillomavirus Evolution.

Burk R, Mirabello L, DeSalle R Viruses. 2023; 15(8).

PMID: 37631973 PMC: 10458755. DOI: 10.3390/v15081631.


Comparative analysis of the Liriomyza chinensis mitochondrial genome with other Agromyzids reveals conserved genome features.

Chen J, Chang Y, Zheng S, Lu M, Du Y Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):8850.

PMID: 29892001 PMC: 5995824. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27213-7.


Complete mitochondrial genomes of Anopheles stephensi and An. dirus and comparative evolutionary mitochondriomics of 50 mosquitoes.

Hao Y, Zou Y, Ding Y, Xu W, Yan Z, Li X Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):7666.

PMID: 28794438 PMC: 5550476. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07977-0.


Population Genetic Structure and Potential Incursion Pathways of the Bluetongue Virus Vector Culicoides brevitarsis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) in Australia.

Tay W, Kerr P, Jermiin L PLoS One. 2016; 11(1):e0146699.

PMID: 26771743 PMC: 4714883. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146699.


References
1.
Kushiro M, Shimizu M, Tomita K . Molecular cloning and sequence determination of the tuf gene coding for the elongation factor Tu of Thermus thermophilus HB8. Eur J Biochem. 1987; 170(1-2):93-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb13671.x. View

2.
Bernardi G . Compositional constraints and genome evolution. J Mol Evol. 1986; 24(1-2):1-11. DOI: 10.1007/BF02099946. View

3.
BELOZERSKY A, Spirin A . A correlation between the compositions of deoxyribonucleic and ribonucleic acids. Nature. 1958; 182(4628):111-2. DOI: 10.1038/182111a0. View

4.
Hemmingsen S, Woolford C, Van Der Vies S, Tilly K, Dennis D, Georgopoulos C . Homologous plant and bacterial proteins chaperone oligomeric protein assembly. Nature. 1988; 333(6171):330-4. DOI: 10.1038/333330a0. View

5.
Bernardi G . The isochore organization of the human genome. Annu Rev Genet. 1989; 23:637-61. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ge.23.120189.003225. View