» Articles » PMID: 7922794

Estimation of the Effect of Salmon Calcitonin in Established Osteoporosis by Biochemical Bone Markers

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 1994 Jul 1
PMID 7922794
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We reviewed data on 42 postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis (forearm fracture or a low bone mass) who had been randomly treated for 1 year with either rectal salmon calcitonin (sCT), 100 IU daily (n = 25) or nasal sCT, 200 IU daily (n = 17) applying an estimation algorithm for bone loss rates. Both groups received a daily calcium supplement of 500 mg. A group of 18 age-matched women who received no treatment served as controls. The bone mineral content of the distal forearm (BMCarm) was measured every 3 months by single photon absorptiometry. The individual rates of change during the 1-year period were calculated by linear regression analysis (alpha BMCarm). Bone loss rates were estimated initially and after 1 year of therapy by measurements of serum alkaline phosphatase, plasma bone Gla protein, and fasting urinary hydroxyproline and calcium (both corrected for creatinine excretion) according to the estimation algorithm. Both administration forms revealed significant control group-corrected decreases in serum and urine markers of bone turnover of 15-40% (P < 0.05-0.01) and positive outcomes of 2% in alpha BMCarm (P < 0.01). The estimated effect on bone mass was expressed as the difference between the bone loss estimated after 1 year and initially (delta ESTBIO). A significant correlation was seen between alpha BMCarm and delta ESTBIO (r = 0.5, P < 0.0001). We conclude that the effect of sCT on bone can be followed up by biochemical markers for bone turnover, i.e., by an annual blood and fasting urine sample, applying an estimation algorithm for the rate of bone loss.

Citing Articles

Current, new and future treatments of osteoporosis.

Sharif P, Abdollahi M, Larijani B Rheumatol Int. 2010; 31(3):289-300.

PMID: 20676643 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-010-1586-z.


Progress in osteoporosis and fracture prevention: focus on postmenopausal women.

Saag K, Geusens P Arthritis Res Ther. 2009; 11(5):251.

PMID: 19849819 PMC: 2787277. DOI: 10.1186/ar2815.


Osteoporosis, schizophrenia and antipsychotics: the need for a comprehensive multifactorial evaluation.

Halbreich U CNS Drugs. 2007; 21(8):641-57.

PMID: 17630817 DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200721080-00003.


Biochemical markers of bone turnover part II: clinical applications in the management of osteoporosis.

Seibel M Clin Biochem Rev. 2007; 27(3):123-38.

PMID: 17268581 PMC: 1579289.


Biochemical markers of bone metabolism in the assessment of osteoporosis: useful or not?.

Seibel M J Endocrinol Invest. 2003; 26(5):464-71.

PMID: 12906376 DOI: 10.1007/BF03345204.


References
1.
Kanis J, Johnell O, Gullberg B, Allander E, DILSEN G, Gennari C . Evidence for efficacy of drugs affecting bone metabolism in preventing hip fracture. BMJ. 1992; 305(6862):1124-8. PMC: 1883704. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.305.6862.1124. View

2.
Overgaard K, Riis B, Christiansen C, Podenphant J, Johansen J . Nasal calcitonin for treatment of established osteoporosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1989; 30(4):435-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1989.tb00443.x. View

3.
Podenphant J, Larsen N, Christiansen C . An easy and reliable method for determination of urinary hydroxyproline. Clin Chim Acta. 1984; 142(1):145-8. DOI: 10.1016/0009-8981(84)90110-4. View

4.
Nilas L, Borg J, Gotfredsen A, Christiansen C . Comparison of single- and dual-photon absorptiometry in postmenopausal bone mineral loss. J Nucl Med. 1985; 26(11):1257-62. View

5.
Lufkin E, Wahner H, OFallon W, Hodgson S, Kotowicz M, Lane A . Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis with transdermal estrogen. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117(1):1-9. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-1. View