» Articles » PMID: 7894957

Kinematic and Kinetic Parameters Associated with Running in Different Shoes

Overview
Journal Br J Sports Med
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1994 Dec 1
PMID 7894957
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The characteristics of the midsole were examined in four pairs of running shoes by a materials test. The variables of interest were the peak acceleration, time to peak acceleration and the kinetic energy absorbed. Ten subjects then ran at a recreational jogging pace (3.5 ms-1) barefoot and in the shoes. An accelerometer secured to the lower tibia was used to measure the peak acceleration and time to peak acceleration associated with footstrike. Subjects were also videoed and a kinematic analysis was undertaken at the knee and ankle joints. The results from the materials test showed that the shoes differed in their midsole characteristics, however, no significant differences (P > 0.05) were observed in the peak acceleration and time to peak acceleration during running in shoes. These variables were significantly greater in the barefoot running condition (P < 0.05), as compared with running in shoes. Small and subtle kinematic differences were observed between the barefoot and shoe conditions. It appears that the differences observed between the shoes in the materials test were not sufficient to elicit the kinematic changes observed between the barefoot and shoe conditions. It is suggested that runners operate within a 'kinetic bandwidth' when responding to impact stresses.

Citing Articles

Gait stability improves following unilateral total ankle arthroplasty.

Barylak M, Arena S, Carpentier S, Queen R J Orthop Res. 2024; 43(2):388-395.

PMID: 39390826 PMC: 11701398. DOI: 10.1002/jor.25992.


Perception of Running Shoe Cushioning: Determining the Correspondence between Subjective Assessment and In-vitro Measurement.

Keshvari B, Mitternacht J, Schubert N, Senner V Int J Exerc Sci. 2024; 17(1):902-915.

PMID: 39253099 PMC: 11382782. DOI: 10.70252/KKCC7055.


Can a shoe-mounted IMU identify the effects of orthotics in ways comparable to gait laboratory measurements?.

Lewin M, Price C, Nester C J Foot Ankle Res. 2023; 16(1):54.

PMID: 37670403 PMC: 10478350. DOI: 10.1186/s13047-023-00654-8.


Reverse dynamics analysis of contact force and muscle activities during the golf swing after total hip arthroplasty.

Harada T, Hamai S, Hara D, Fujita T, Okazawa K, Kozono N Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):8688.

PMID: 37248313 PMC: 10227076. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35484-y.


The Use of Wearable Sensors for Preventing, Assessing, and Informing Recovery from Sport-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Preatoni E, Bergamini E, Fantozzi S, Giraud L, Orejel Bustos A, Vannozzi G Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(9).

PMID: 35590914 PMC: 9105988. DOI: 10.3390/s22093225.


References
1.
Light L, McLellan G, Klenerman L . Skeletal transients on heel strike in normal walking with different footwear. J Biomech. 1980; 13(6):477-80. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(80)90340-1. View

2.
Wosk J, Voloshin A . Wave attenuation in skeletons of young healthy persons. J Biomech. 1981; 14(4):261-7. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(81)90071-3. View

3.
Voloshin A, Wosk J, Brull M . Force wave transmission through the human locomotor system. J Biomech Eng. 1981; 103(1):48-50. DOI: 10.1115/1.3138245. View

4.
Nigg B . The validity and relevance of tests used for the assessment of sports surfaces. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990; 22(1):131-9. View

5.
Clarke T, Frederick E, Cooper L . Effects of shoe cushioning upon ground reaction forces in running. Int J Sports Med. 1983; 4(4):247-51. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1026043. View