» Articles » PMID: 7876307

Genetic Deletion of ABP-120 Alters the Three-dimensional Organization of Actin Filaments in Dictyostelium Pseudopods

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1995 Mar 1
PMID 7876307
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study extends the observations on the defects in pseudopod formation of ABP-120+ and ABP-120- cells by a detailed morphological and biochemical analysis of the actin based cytoskeleton. Both ABP-120+ and ABP-120- cells polymerize the same amount of F-actin in response to stimulation with cAMP. However, unlike ABP-120+ cells, ABP-120- cells do not incorporate actin into the Triton X-100-insoluble cytoskeleton at 30-50 s, the time when ABP-120 is incorporated into the cytoskeleton and when pseudopods are extended after cAMP stimulation in wild-type cells. By confocal and electron microscopy, pseudopods extended by ABP-120- cells are not as large or thick as those produced by ABP-120+ cells and in the electron microscope, an altered filament network is found in pseudopods of ABP-120- cells when compared to pseudopods of ABP-120+ cells. The actin filaments found in areas of pseudopods in ABP-120+ cells either before or after stimulation were long, straight, and arranged into space filling orthogonal networks. Protrusions of ABP-120- cells are less three-dimensional, denser, and filled with multiple foci of aggregated filaments consistent with collapse of the filament network due to the absence of ABP-120-mediated cross-linking activity. The different organization of actin filaments may account for the diminished size of protrusions observed in living and fixed ABP-120- cells compared to ABP-120+ cells and is consistent with the role of ABP-120 in regulating pseudopod extension through its cross-linking of actin filaments.

Citing Articles

Regulation of the Actin Cytoskeleton via Rho GTPase Signalling in and Mammalian Cells: A Parallel Slalom.

Filic V, Mijanovic L, Putar D, Talajic A, Cetkovic H, Weber I Cells. 2021; 10(7).

PMID: 34202767 PMC: 8305917. DOI: 10.3390/cells10071592.


Mechanosensitive Adhesion Explains Stepping Motility in Amoeboid Cells.

Copos C, Walcott S, Del Alamo J, Bastounis E, Mogilner A, Guy R Biophys J. 2017; 112(12):2672-2682.

PMID: 28636923 PMC: 5478966. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.033.


Three-dimensional balance of cortical tension and axial contractility enables fast amoeboid migration.

Alvarez-Gonzalez B, Meili R, Bastounis E, Firtel R, Lasheras J, Del Alamo J Biophys J. 2015; 108(4):821-832.

PMID: 25692587 PMC: 4336364. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.3478.


Both contractile axial and lateral traction force dynamics drive amoeboid cell motility.

Bastounis E, Meili R, Alvarez-Gonzalez B, Francois J, Del Alamo J, Firtel R J Cell Biol. 2014; 204(6):1045-61.

PMID: 24637328 PMC: 3998796. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201307106.


Cease-fire at the leading edge: new perspectives on actin filament branching, debranching, and cross-linking.

Ydenberg C, Smith B, Breitsprecher D, Gelles J, Goode B Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2011; 68(11):596-602.

PMID: 22002930 PMC: 3218376. DOI: 10.1002/cm.20543.


References
1.
Condeelis J . Life at the leading edge: the formation of cell protrusions. Annu Rev Cell Biol. 1993; 9:411-44. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cb.09.110193.002211. View

2.
Wessels D, Murray J, Jung G, Hammer 3rd J, Soll D . Myosin IB null mutants of Dictyostelium exhibit abnormalities in motility. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 1991; 20(4):301-15. DOI: 10.1002/cm.970200406. View

3.
Omann G, Allen R, Bokoch G, Painter R, Traynor A, Sklar L . Signal transduction and cytoskeletal activation in the neutrophil. Physiol Rev. 1987; 67(1):285-322. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1987.67.1.285. View

4.
Condeelis J . Understanding the cortex of crawling cells: insights from Dictyostelium. Trends Cell Biol. 1993; 3(11):371-6. DOI: 10.1016/0962-8924(93)90085-f. View

5.
Condeelis J, Bresnick A, Demma M, Dharmawardhane S, Eddy R, Hall A . Mechanisms of amoeboid chemotaxis: an evaluation of the cortical expansion model. Dev Genet. 1990; 11(5-6):333-40. DOI: 10.1002/dvg.1020110504. View