» Articles » PMID: 7871030

Centrally Acting Drugs Act As Conditioned Stimuli in a Conditioned Suppression of Drinking Task

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1993 Jan 1
PMID 7871030
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An experiment was conducted to test whether centrally acting drugs could act as conditioned stimuli (CS) in a classical conditioning paradigm in which electric shock acted as the unconditioned stimulus (US) and suppression of drinking was used as an indicator of a conditioned response (CR). Thirsty rats were allowed to drink water during daily classical conditioning sessions which took place in their home cages. The CS was either a drug injected before the session or a "cocktail" of sensory stimuli (light + tone + vibration) turned on at the beginning of the session. Part way through some sessions the animals received electric foot shock as the US. Two different drugs and the sensory cocktail were used as CSs in a discriminated classical conditioning paradigm in which one drug or stimulus (the CS+) predicted the subsequent occurrence of shock, and the other two conditions acted as CS- stimuli and predicted absence of shock. After an average of 5.7 pairings of the CS+ with shock, conditioned suppression of drinking was observed; the CR occurred only during tests preceded by the CS+ drug or stimulus. At one time or another during the experiment, pentobarbital, phencyclidine, morphine, and pentylenetetrazol were employed as the CS+. Each acquired the ability to elicit a CR, although pentobarbital was noticeably less effective than the other three drugs. All conditioning trials took place in hanging metal cages, but the CR generalized into plastic cages with sawdust floors. Each rat received three successive phases of conditioning with a different CS+ condition employed in each phase; each phase of conditioning was followed by extinction of the CR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

The relative salience of morphine and contextual cues as conditioned stimuli.

Bormann N, OVERTON D Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1996; 123(2):164-71.

PMID: 8741939 DOI: 10.1007/BF02246173.


Morphine as a conditioned stimulus in a conditioned emotional response paradigm.

Bormann N, OVERTON D Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993; 112(2-3):277-84.

PMID: 7871031 DOI: 10.1007/BF02244922.

References
1.
OVERTON D, Leonard W, Merkle D . Methods for measuring the strength of discriminable drug effects. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1986; 10(3):251-63. DOI: 10.1016/0149-7634(86)90012-6. View

2.
SCHMIDT Jr H, MOAK S . Some drug effects influencing barbiturate facilitation of water ingestion. Am J Physiol. 1959; 196(2):307-10. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1959.196.2.307. View

3.
Wilkin L, Cunningham C, Fitzgerald R . Pavlovian conditioning with ethanol and lithium: effects on heart rate and taste aversion in rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1982; 96(5):781-90. DOI: 10.1037/h0077924. View

4.
Mastropaolo J, Moskowitz K, Dacanay R, Riley A . Conditioned taste aversions as a behavioral baseline for drug discrimination learning: an assessment with phencyclidine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989; 32(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(89)90203-7. View

5.
Silverman P . Classically conditioned ethanol stimulus control of a motor behavior. Alcohol. 1990; 7(6):489-92. DOI: 10.1016/0741-8329(90)90037-d. View