» Articles » PMID: 786974

Employing Electric Shock with Autistic Children. A Review of the Side Effects

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 1976 Jun 1
PMID 786974
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The use of electric shock in a punishment paradigm has continued to be a highly controversial issue in the treatment of autistic children. While the experimental literature argues for the effectiveness of the procedure for reducing maladaptive behaviors, some clinicians and researchers have expressed fear of possible negative side effects. The reported side effects of contingent electric shock were reviewed in an attempt to evaluate the validity of these fears. The review indicated that the majority of reported side effects of shock were of a positive nature. These positive effects included response generalization, increases in social behavior, and positive emotional behavior. The few negative side effects reported included fear of the shock apparatus, negative emotional behavior, and increases in other maladaptive behavior. The implication of these findings for the use of the shock procedure are discussed in terms of correct usage of the shock, therapist reservations, and alternative procedures.

Citing Articles

Parent Perceptions of Behavior Analytic Interventions.

Wilson J, Lesack R Behav Anal Pract. 2025; 17(4):1050-1073.

PMID: 39790923 PMC: 11706823. DOI: 10.1007/s40617-024-01010-3.


A new technology for pacifier weaning: a thematic analysis.

Al Hariri A Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1161886.

PMID: 37292379 PMC: 10244660. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1161886.


Social Validity of Pivotal Response Treatment for Young Autistic Children: Perspectives of Autistic Adults.

Schuck R, Dwyer P, Baiden K, Williams Z, Wang M J Autism Dev Disord. 2022; 54(2):423-441.

PMID: 36427175 PMC: 10821825. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-022-05808-4.


Tensions Between Autistic Sociality, Communication, and Social Skills Research: Utilizing the Communication Bill of Rights to Support Autistic People.

Camarata S J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022; 65(11):4351-4353.

PMID: 36256579 PMC: 10023175. DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00525.


Balancing Respect for Individuals, Human Rights, Neurodiversity, and Positive Behavioral Support in Intervention Research for a Spectrum of Autistic People.

Camarata S J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022; 65(4):1607-1609.

PMID: 35263554 PMC: 10023180. DOI: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00660.


References
1.
Birnbrauer J . Generalization of punishment effects-a case study. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968; 1(3):201-11. PMC: 1311002. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-201. View

2.
Nordquist V . The modification of a child's enuresis: some response-response relationships. J Appl Behav Anal. 1971; 4(3):241-7. PMC: 1310697. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-241. View

3.
Lovaas O, Simmons J . Manipulation of self-destruction in three retarded children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969; 2(3):143-57. PMC: 1311058. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-143. View

4.
Foxx R, Azrin N . Restitution: a method of eliminating aggressive-disruptive behavior of retarded and brain damaged patients. Behav Res Ther. 1972; 10(1):15-27. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(72)90003-4. View

5.
Wahler R . Some structural aspects of deviant child behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1975; 8(1):27-42. PMC: 1311815. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1975.8-27. View