» Articles » PMID: 7866173

Natural Course of 500 Consecutive Cases of Whooping Cough: a General Practice Population Study

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1995 Feb 4
PMID 7866173
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To describe the natural course of whooping cough.

Design: Observational study of a general practice population.

Setting: Discrete semirural East Midlands practice of 11,500 patients.

Subjects: 500 consecutive cases of whooping cough diagnosed clinically during 1977-92.

Main Outcome Measures: Incidence of vomiting, whooping, apnoea, admission to hospital, and complications; duration and frequency of paroxysms. Pattern of spread.

Results: The incidence in the practice population was 4347/100,000 population compared with a notification rate for England and Wales of 717/100,000. Most cases were relatively mild. 284 patients vomited after paroxysms, 242 whooped, and 57 had apnoea. Duration and frequency of paroxysms varied widely. Female and unimmunised patients suffered more severe disease. Bordetella was isolated from fewer immunised patients (24/96 v 63/122 unimmunised). Infection was usually spread through contacts with someone with clinical whooping cough. Five patients developed pneumonia, three of whom had been immunised. Three patients required hospital admission.

Conclusions: Most cases of whooping cough are relatively mild. Such cases are difficult to diagnose without a high index of suspicion because doctors are unlikely to hear the characteristic cough, which may be the only symptom. Parents can be reassured that a serious outcome is unlikely. Adults also get whooping cough, especially from their children, and get the same symptoms as children. The difficulty of early diagnosis and probability of missed cases reinforces the need to keep the incidence low through immunisation in order to protect infants, who are the most vulnerable.

Citing Articles

Risk Factors of Pertussis Among Older Adults in South Korea: A Nationwide Health Data-Based Case-Control Study.

Kim H, Shin J, Chen J, Kim J, Noh Y, Cheong H Infect Dis Ther. 2023; 12(2):545-561.

PMID: 36588139 PMC: 9925654. DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00747-0.


Geographic disparities and socio-demographic predictors of pertussis risk in Florida.

Tandy C, Odoi A PeerJ. 2021; 9:e11902.

PMID: 34540361 PMC: 8415280. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11902.


Bordetella pertussis Infection in South African HIV-Infected and HIV-Uninfected Mother-Infant Dyads: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Nunes M, Downs S, Jones S, van Niekerk N, Cutland C, Madhi S Clin Infect Dis. 2016; 63(suppl 4):S174-S180.

PMID: 27838670 PMC: 5106617. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw527.


Pertussis: Microbiology, Disease, Treatment, and Prevention.

Kilgore P, Salim A, Zervos M, Schmitt H Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016; 29(3):449-86.

PMID: 27029594 PMC: 4861987. DOI: 10.1128/CMR.00083-15.


Infantile Apparent Life-Threatening Events, an Educational Review.

Aminiahidashti H Emerg (Tehran). 2015; 3(1):8-15.

PMID: 26512363 PMC: 4614610.


References
1.
Miller C, FLETCHER W . Severity of notified whooping cough. Br Med J. 1976; 1(6002):117-9. PMC: 1638600. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6002.117. View

2.
Jenkinson D . Outbreak of whooping cough in general practice. Br Med J. 1978; 2(6136):577-8. PMC: 1607029. View

3.
Newcombe R, Gray O, SKONE J, Howells C, Lennox M, Hine D . The effects of immunisation upon the natural history of pertussis. A family study in the Cardiff area. J Epidemiol Community Health (1978). 1978; 32(3):194-9. PMC: 1060945. DOI: 10.1136/jech.32.3.194. View

4.
Grob P, Crowder M, Robbins J . Effect of vaccination on severity and dissemination of whooping cough. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981; 282(6280):1925-8. PMC: 1505783. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.282.6280.1925. View

5.
Jenkinson D . Whooping cough: what proportion of cases is notified in an epidemic?. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983; 287(6386):185-6. PMC: 1548671. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.287.6386.185. View