» Articles » PMID: 7865854

Breast Conservation Therapy: Local Tumor Control in Patients with Pathologically Clear Margins Who Receive 5000 CGy Breast Irradiation Without Local Boost

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 7865854
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A retrospective study was performed to determine the value of pathological evaluation of inked primary tumor specimen margins in the local control of patients with stage I and II breast cancer. In 150 patients with 153 invasive breast cancers, treatment involved surgical resection of the primary tumor, pathological determination of tumor-free inked specimen margins, and 5000 cGy whole breast radiation therapy (RT) without tumor bed RT local boost. This approach yielded an actuarial five-year local control rate of 95%. The local control rate was 96% for T-1 cases and 93% for T-2 cases. The local control rate was 96% for patients with clear margins achieved at initial resection and 94% for patients with clear margins achieved at re-excision. Among patients with clear margins at re-excision, the local control rate was 97% for those with no residual cancer and 88% for those with residual cancer. Patients with surgical margins clear by 3 mm or less had a local control rate of 92% at five years. Local control rates appear to be comparable to other breast conservation approaches which routinely employ local RT boosts. In omitting the local RT boost in patients with clear margins, the overall RT course will be briefer and the cosmetic changes associated with high-dose, large volume local RT boosts can be avoided.

Citing Articles

Impact of pathological characteristics on local relapse after breast-conserving therapy: a subgroup analysis of the EORTC boost versus no boost trial.

Jones H, Antonini N, Hart A, Peterse J, Horiot J, Collin F J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(30):4939-47.

PMID: 19720914 PMC: 2799051. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.5764.


Breast cancer local recurrence: risk factors and prognostic relevance of early time to recurrence.

Neri A, Marrelli D, Rossi S, De Stefano A, Mariani F, De Marco G World J Surg. 2006; 31(1):36-45.

PMID: 17180474 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-006-0097-2.

References
1.
McCormick B, Kinne D, Petrek J, Osborne M, Cox L, Shank B . Limited resection for breast cancer: a study of inked specimen margins before radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1987; 13(11):1667-71. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(87)90163-5. View

2.
Schnitt S, Connolly J . Processing and evaluation of breast excision specimens. A clinically oriented approach. Am J Clin Pathol. 1992; 98(1):125-37. DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/98.1.125. View

3.
Schmidt-Ullrich R, Wazer D, Tercilla O, Safaii H, MARCHANT D, Smith T . Tumor margin assessment as a guide to optimal conservation surgery and irradiation in early stage breast carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989; 17(4):733-8. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90059-x. View

4.
Pezner R, Terz J, Hill L . Now there are two effective conservation approaches for patients with stage I and II breast cancer: how pathological assessment of inked resection margins can provide valuable information for the radiation oncologist. Am J Clin Oncol. 1990; 13(2):175-9. DOI: 10.1097/00000421-199004000-00018. View

5.
Sarrazin D, Le M, Arriagada R, Contesso G, Fontaine F, Spielmann M . Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1989; 14(3):177-84. DOI: 10.1016/0167-8140(89)90165-5. View