» Articles » PMID: 7854590

Rat and Human Sensory Evoked Potentials and the Predictability of Human Neurotoxicity from Rat Data

Overview
Journal Neurotoxicology
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 7854590
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The development of comprehensive quantitative models as alternatives to risk assessment based on uncertainty factors will require many steps, among them consideration of the relationships between the health endpoints which are measured in laboratory animals and humans. Sensory evoked potentials are measures of sensory function which can be recorded from many species, including humans, and as such provide an opportunity for examining the extrapolation of neurotoxicity data from laboratory animals to humans. Our research strategy for investigating how well laboratory rat data predict human neurotoxic risk involves comparing parametric stimulus manipulations and drug treatments in both species. Finally, we are comparing results in humans with neurodegenerative conditions, including those induced by neurotoxicant exposure, with animal models. To date, we have focused on pattern-elicited visual evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded from pigmented rats and humans. Parametric manipulations of spatial frequency, temporal frequency and stimulus contrast revealed parallel functions, displaced for differences in absolute sensitivity. Additionally, diazepam produced similar effects in rats and human volunteers. A quantitative cross-species map was developed to illustrate the prediction of human effects from rat data. Exposure to carbon disulfide produced changes in rat VEP-derived contrast sensitivity functions, which resembled psychophysically-measured loss of visual contrast sensitivity in human workers exposed to organic solvents. The results of these continuing efforts should help indicate how well animal electrophysiological measures predict human neurotoxicity.

Citing Articles

Follow-up of the re-evaluation of sulfur dioxide (E 220), sodium sulfite (E 221), sodium bisulfite (E 222), sodium metabisulfite (E 223), potassium metabisulfite (E 224), calcium sulfite (E 226), calcium bisulfite (E 227) and potassium bisulfite (E....

Younes M, Aquilina G, Castle L, Engel K, Fowler P, Frutos Fernandez M EFSA J. 2022; 20(11):e07594.

PMID: 36440381 PMC: 9685353. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7594.


The Future of Neurotoxicology: A Neuroelectrophysiological Viewpoint.

Herr D Front Toxicol. 2021; 3(729788):1.

PMID: 34966904 PMC: 8711081. DOI: 10.3389/ftox.2021.729788.


Animal to human translation: a systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates.

Leenaars C, Kouwenaar C, Stafleu F, Bleich A, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, De Vries R J Transl Med. 2019; 17(1):223.

PMID: 31307492 PMC: 6631915. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1976-2.


Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models.

Rice D, Barone Jr S Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108 Suppl 3:511-33.

PMID: 10852851 PMC: 1637807. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108s3511.


Neurotoxic and pharmacokinetic responses to trichloroethylene as a function of exposure scenario.

Boyes W, Bushnell P, Crofton K, Evans M, Simmons J Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108 Suppl 2:317-22.

PMID: 10807561 PMC: 1637762. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108s2317.