» Articles » PMID: 7819004

Reliability of Haemodialysis Urea Kinetic Modelling in Children

Overview
Journal Pediatr Nephrol
Specialties Nephrology
Pediatrics
Date 1994 Oct 1
PMID 7819004
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The reliability of urea kinetic modelling (UKM) in paediatric haemodialysis was tested by comparing results of the classic variable volume model (UKM3), a recently introduced two-sample modification of this (UKM2) and direct quantification by a partial dialysate collection method (PDC). Urea generation rate (G) was also found from a 1-week collection of dialysate and urine (OWC). Nine children aged 2-18 years and weighing 10.6-39.9 kg were examined over 1 week (25 treatments). UKM3 and UKM2 gave almost identical results, but deviated from PDC and OWC. The two indirect methods overestimated G by 24% and 18%. However, the correlations between the results were very high for all variables and all methods (r > or = 0.96). Repeating UKM3 and UKM2 mid-week for 5 consecutive weeks, the following coefficients of variation were found: for the normalised whole body urea clearance (Kt/V) 10% and 11%, respectively; for normalised protein catabolic rate 17% and 14%. It is concluded that all tested methods can be used, but each method requires its own reference interval. Results of UKM seem to vary somewhat more than in adults. This should be considered when assessing children by such methods.

Citing Articles

Hemodialysis in children: general practical guidelines.

Fischbach M, Edefonti A, Schroder C, Watson A Pediatr Nephrol. 2005; 20(8):1054-66.

PMID: 15947992 PMC: 1766474. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-005-1876-y.


Drug dosing during intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy : special considerations in pediatric patients.

Veltri M, Neu A, Fivush B, Parekh R, Furth S Paediatr Drugs. 2004; 6(1):45-65.

PMID: 14969569 DOI: 10.2165/00148581-200406010-00004.

References
1.
Tiffany T, Jansen J, Burtis C, Overton J, Scott C . Enzymatic kinetic rate and end-point analyses of substrate, by use of a GeMSAEC fast analyzer. Clin Chem. 1972; 18(8):829-40. View

2.
Depner T, Cheer A . Modeling urea kinetics with two vs. three BUN measurements. A critical comparison. ASAIO Trans. 1989; 35(3):499-502. View

3.
Laird N, Berkey C, Lowrie E . Modeling success or failure of dialysis therapy: the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int Suppl. 1983; (13):S101-6. View

4.
Ellis P, Malchesky P, Magnusson M, Goormastic M, Nakamoto S . Comparison of two methods of kinetic modeling. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs. 1984; 30:60-4. View

5.
Buur T . Precision of hemodialysis urea kinetic modeling: empirical data and Monte Carlo simulation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1991; 35(1):25-34. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2607(91)90101-x. View