» Articles » PMID: 7815099

Proliferative Potential and Prognostic Evaluation of Low-grade Astrocytomas

Overview
Journal J Neurooncol
Publisher Springer
Date 1994 Jan 1
PMID 7815099
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Despite their histological similarity, low-grade astrocytomas vary widely in their clinical behavior. To elucidate this variable behavior, we measured the proliferative potential of 69 primary and 18 recurrent low-grade astrocytomas and correlated the results with the clinical characteristics and outcome. Each patient received an intravenous infusion of bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR); BUdR-labeled nuclei in excised tumor specimens were identified by immunoperoxidase staining. The BUdR labeling index (LI), or S-phase fraction, ranged from < 1 to 9.3%; the LI was < 1% in 64 (74%) patients and > or = 1% in 23 patients (26%). The LI did not appear to be associated with age, sex, tumor location, or whether the tumor was primary or recurrent. A Cox proportional-hazards analysis of the influence of the LI and other variables (age, sex, tumor location, extent of surgery, primary versus recurrent tumor) on survival showed that the LI and extent of surgery (total resection, subtotal resection, biopsy) were significant in predicting both survival and progression-free survival for all patients and for patients with primary tumors. The LI was also significant in predicting progression-free survival for patients with recurrent tumors. The correlation between the BUdR LI and both survival and time to recurrence suggests that the outcome of low-grade astrocytomas varies according to the proliferative potential. The growth rate of these histologically similar tumors should be assessed individually in order to select specific treatment.

Citing Articles

Maximizing safe resection of low- and high-grade glioma.

Hervey-Jumper S, Berger M J Neurooncol. 2016; 130(2):269-282.

PMID: 27174197 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2110-4.


Management of patients with recurrence of diffuse low grade glioma: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Nahed B, Redjal N, Brat D, Chi A, Oh K, Batchelor T J Neurooncol. 2015; 125(3):609-30.

PMID: 26530264 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-015-1910-2.


Role of surgical resection in low- and high-grade gliomas.

Hervey-Jumper S, Berger M Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014; 16(4):284.

PMID: 24595756 DOI: 10.1007/s11940-014-0284-7.


Operative techniques for gliomas and the value of extent of resection.

Sanai N, Berger M Neurotherapeutics. 2009; 6(3):478-86.

PMID: 19560738 PMC: 5084184. DOI: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.04.005.


Techniques to assess the proliferative potential of brain tumors.

Quinones-Hinojosa A, Sanai N, Smith J, McDermott M J Neurooncol. 2005; 74(1):19-30.

PMID: 16078103 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-004-5758-0.


References
1.
Daumas-Duport C, Scheithauer B, OFallon J, Kelly P . Grading of astrocytomas. A simple and reproducible method. Cancer. 1988; 62(10):2152-65. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19881115)62:10<2152::aid-cncr2820621015>3.0.co;2-t. View

2.
North C, North R, Epstein J, Piantadosi S, Wharam M . Low-grade cerebral astrocytomas. Survival and quality of life after radiation therapy. Cancer. 1990; 66(1):6-14. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19900701)66:1<6::aid-cncr2820660103>3.0.co;2-f. View

3.
Weir B, Grace M . The relative significance of factors affecting postoperative survival in astrocytomas, grades one and two. Can J Neurol Sci. 1976; 3(1):47-50. DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100025993. View

4.
Hoshino T, Rodriguez L, Cho K, Lee K, Wilson C, Edwards M . Prognostic implications of the proliferative potential of low-grade astrocytomas. J Neurosurg. 1988; 69(6):839-42. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1988.69.6.0839. View

5.
Nishizaki T, Orita T, Kajiwara K, Ikeda N, Ohshita N, Nakayama H . Correlation of in vitro bromodeoxyuridine labeling index and DNA aneuploidy with survival or recurrence in brain-tumor patients. J Neurosurg. 1990; 73(3):396-400. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1990.73.3.0396. View