» Articles » PMID: 7751187

Dosimetry Guidelines to Minimize Urethral and Rectal Morbidity Following Transperineal I-125 Prostate Brachytherapy

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 1995 May 15
PMID 7751187
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To establish dosimetry guidelines to minimize urethral and rectal morbidity following permanent I-125 prostatic brachytherapy.

Methods And Materials: Dosimetric parameters were correlated with long-term morbidity for 65 patients following transperineal I-125 implantation for Stage T1/T2 prostatic carcinoma. The prescribed minimum prostatic dose was 150 Gy. The median total activity used was 48 mCi (range: 32-77 mCi). Patients were followed for 1-5 years (median follow-up: 2 years). Postimplant computerized tomography (CT)-based dosimetry was performed for 45 patients. Morbidity was evaluated using a modification of the RTOG grading system, with a scale of grade 0-5.

Results: The incidence of grades 2 and 3 urinary morbidity was associated with the maximum central urethral dose (p = 0.03), and with the length of urethra that received greater than 400 Gy (p = 0.07). Patients with larger prostates had more long-term urinary morbidity (p = 0.06). Rectal bleeding (RTOG grade 1) or ulceration (RTOG grade 2) was associated with irradiation of the rectal wall to doses in excess of 100 Gy (p = 0.02). There was no relationship between the matched peripheral dose (MPD), mCi/source or total mCi implanted and long-term morbidity.

Conclusions: Postimplant, CT-based dosimetry can predict which patients are at higher risk of radiation-related morbidity. More simplistic parameters including the MPD, total activity implanted, or mCi/source, had no relationship with morbidity. To decrease the risk of long-term morbidity, an effort should be made to keep the central urethral dose below 400 Gy, and the rectal surface dose below 100 Gy.

Citing Articles

Clinical Efficacy and Openness to New Challenges of Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer.

Kato M, Higashi S, Sugino Y, Kajiwara S, Tanaka S, Kitano G Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(11):9824-9835.

PMID: 37999133 PMC: 10670683. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110713.


Validation of the bladder neck as an important organ at risk in prostate seed brachytherapy based on D: A single-institution, retrospective review.

Wallace N, Olden K, Brennan V, Samuji M, Jamaluddin M, McVey G J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2023; 15(2):96-102.

PMID: 37215610 PMC: 10196733. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2023.126315.


Chronological changes of lower urinary tract symptoms after low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer using SpaceOAR® system.

Taniguchi T, Iinuma K, Nakano M, Kawase M, Takeuchi S, Kato D Prostate Int. 2022; 10(4):207-212.

PMID: 36570644 PMC: 9747576. DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.06.003.


Patient assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms using the international prostate symptom score following low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.

Farris J, Hughes R, Steber C, Craven T, Frizzell B Brachytherapy. 2021; 20(6):1107-1113.

PMID: 34353749 PMC: 9019850. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.05.009.


Strict bladder filling and rectal emptying during prostate SBRT: Does it make a dosimetric or clinical difference?.

Byun D, Gorovets D, Jacobs L, Happersett L, Zhang P, Pei X Radiat Oncol. 2020; 15(1):239.

PMID: 33066781 PMC: 7565753. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01681-6.