Randomised Clinical Trial of Two Treatment Regimens of Natural Surfactant Preparations in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Overview
Pediatrics
Authors
Affiliations
Aims: To compare treatment regimens of two widely used natural surfactant preparations Curosurf and Survanta in respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).
Methods: The effects of the two treatment regimens on gas exchange, ventilatory requirements, and 28 day outcome in infants with RDS were compared. Seventy five preterm infants (birth weight 700-1500 g) with RDS requiring artificial ventilation with an FIO2 of > or = 0.4, were randomly selected at 1-24 hours of age. One group received an initial dose of Curosurf (200 mg/kg); the other group Survanta (100 mg/kg). Patients who remained dependent on artificial ventilation with an FIO2 of > or = 0.3 received up to two additional doses of Curosurf (each of 100 mg/kg) after 12 and 24 hours or up to three additional doses of Survanta (each of 100 mg/kg) between six and 48 hours after the initial dose.
Results: There was a rapid improvement in oxygenation and ventilatory requirements were reduced in both groups. However, infants treated with Curosurf had a higher arterial:alveolar oxygen tension ratio and required a lower peak inspiratory pressure and mean airway pressure at several time points within 24 hours of randomisation (p < 0.05-0.001). The incidences of pneumothorax in the Curosurf and Survanta groups were 6% and 12.5%, respectively; the corresponding figures for grades 3-4 intracerebral haemorrhage were 3% and 12.5%, respectively. Mortality was 3% in the Curosurf group and 12.5% in the Survanta group. However, these differences did not reach significance.
Conclusion: The Curosurf treatment regimen resulted in a more rapid improvement in oxygenation than Survanta and reduced ventilatory requirements up to 24 hours after start of treatment. This was associated with a trend towards reduced incidence of serious pulmonary and non-pulmonary complications.
Qiu C, Ma C, Fan N, Zhang X, Zheng G Arch Med Sci. 2023; 19(5):1446-1453.
PMID: 37732036 PMC: 10507746. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2020.97065.
Izadi R, Shojaei P, Haqbin A, Habibolahi A, Sadeghi-Moghaddam P PLoS One. 2023; 18(6):e0286997.
PMID: 37390082 PMC: 10313081. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286997.
Surfactant Stock Optimization for Cost Minimization in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.
Narli M, Kokangul A J Healthc Eng. 2021; 2021:8346584.
PMID: 34900205 PMC: 8654546. DOI: 10.1155/2021/8346584.
Qiao Q, Liu X, Yang T, Cui K, Kong L, Yang C Acta Pharm Sin B. 2021; 11(10):3060-3091.
PMID: 33977080 PMC: 8102084. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.04.023.
Bilayer aggregate microstructure determines viscoelasticity of lung surfactant suspensions.
Ciutara C, Zasadzinski J Soft Matter. 2021; 17(20):5170-5182.
PMID: 33929473 PMC: 8194287. DOI: 10.1039/d1sm00337b.