Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Physiologic and Psychosocial Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To compare the effects of comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation with those of education alone on physiologic and psychosocial outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Design: Randomized clinical trial.
Setting: University medical center.
Patients: 119 outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that was stable while patients received a standard medical regimen.
Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned to either an 8-week comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation program or to an 8-week education program. Pulmonary rehabilitation consisted of twelve 4-hour sessions that included education, physical and respiratory care instruction, psychosocial support, and supervised exercise training. Monthly reinforcement sessions were held for 1 year. The education group attended four 2-hour sessions that included video-tapes, lectures, and discussions but not individual instruction or exercise training.
Measurements: Pulmonary function, maximum exercise tolerance and endurance, gas exchange, symptoms of perceived breathlessness and muscle fatigue with exercise, shortness of breath, self-efficacy for walking, depression, general quality of well-being, and hospitalizations associated with pulmonary diseases. Patients were followed for 6 years.
Results: Compared with education alone, comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation produced a significantly greater increase in maximal exercise tolerance (+1.5 metabolic equivalents [METS] compared with +0.6 METS [P < 0.001]; maximal oxygen uptake, +0.11 L/min compared with +0.03 L/min [P = 0.06]), exercise endurance (+10.5 minutes compared with +1.3 minutes [P < 0.001]), symptoms of perceived breathlessness (score of -1.5 compared with +0.2 [P < 0.001]) and muscle fatigue (score of -1.4 compared with -0.2 [P < 0.01]), shortness of breath (score of -7.0 compared with +0.6 [P < 0.01]), and self-efficacy for walking (score of +1.4 compared with +0.1 [P < 0.05]). There were slight but nonsignificant differences in survival (67% compared with 56% [P = 0.32]) and duration of hospital stay (-2.4 days/patient per year compared with +1.3 days/patient per year [P = 0.20]). Measures of lung function, depression, and general quality of life did not differ between groups. Differences tended to diminish after 1 year of follow-up.
Conclusions: Comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation significantly improved exercise performance and symptoms for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Benefits were partially maintained for at least 1 year and tended to diminish after that time.
Chien S, Hu H, Cho H J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e63660.
PMID: 39908545 PMC: 11840360. DOI: 10.2196/63660.
Sharifi V, Brazzale D, McDonald C, Hill C, Michael C, Ruehland W BMC Pulm Med. 2024; 24(1):501.
PMID: 39390462 PMC: 11465484. DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03319-9.
Increasing exercise capacity and physical activity in the COPD patient.
Kaur A, Bourbeau J, Brighton L, Celli B, Crouch R, Demeyer H Breathe (Sheff). 2024; 20(2):230347.
PMID: 38873235 PMC: 11167654. DOI: 10.1183/20734735.0347-2023.
Evans R Respir Care. 2024; 69(6):697-712.
PMID: 38806225 PMC: 11147632. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.12089.
Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Look Back, a Look Forward.
MacIntyre N Respir Care. 2024; 69(6):633-639.
PMID: 38594037 PMC: 11147627. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.11740.